Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh

2016-01-07 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/01/16 21:25, Damian Johnson wrote: > Nice! Few questions... > > * Where are your metrics-lib scripts used for the benchmarks? > Should be easy for me to write stem counterparts once I know what > we're running. I'll later be including our demo s

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2016-01-07 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > Mike Perry: >> Mike Perry: >> > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's >> > comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you >> > commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not

Re: [tor-dev] Much-revised draft, RFC: removing current obsolete clients from the network

2016-01-07 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 8 Jan 2016, at 04:12, Nick Mathewson wrote: > ... > > 2. Some ideas that don't work. > > ... > > 2.2. Blocking circuit creation under certain circumstances > > In tor 0.2.5.1-alpha, we began ignoring the UseNTorHandshake option, > and always preferring the ntor handshake where availa

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 264: Putting version numbers on the Tor subprotocols

2016-01-07 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 7 Jan 2016, at 10:14, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > We shouldn't add protocols for features where others can remain > oblivious to their presence or absence. For example, if some > directory caches start supporting a new header, and clients can > safely send that header without knowing

Re: [tor-dev] Two major improvements to the Tor Metrics back-end

2016-01-07 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/01/16 21:06, Aaron Johnson wrote: > The dots are execution times to calculate the stats. So the > much-lower dot for hidden service stats is a big improvement! Exactly, thanks for explaining, Aaron. All the best, Karsten > > Aaron > >> On J