Re: [tor-dev] Scheduling next proposal discussion meetings

Tim Wilson-Brown - teor writes: > [ text/plain ] > >> On 16 Mar 2016, at 12:12, Isabela wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> Quick reminder that tomorrow we will have prop 224 discussion: >> >> Proposal 224: Next-Generation Hidden Services in Tor >> Wednesday, March 16th 1500 UTC >> Must-have attende

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

Hi Pierre, on first glance looks like a nice proposal. Just a heads up though that to be considered there needs to be a prospective mentor for this project. Reaching out to tor-dev@ is a great first step and hopefully it'll do the trick, but if it doesn't try asking on the #tor-dev irc channel. Ch

Re: [tor-dev] Revisiting prop224 cells

On 15 Mar (18:13:02), George Kadianakis wrote: > Hello, > > I took a look at proposal 224 again, with the aim of revisiting the cell > logic and format. > > Here are some matters that require discussion: > > 1) Should we keep backwards compability with old introduction and rendezvous > points?

[tor-dev] Meeting about the new guard algorithm proposal (prop259)

Hello there, seems like the prop259 algorithm has kind of stabilized and you guys have jumped into implementation. That's great! A small problem in this process is that I'm probably the only person in Tor who understands the new algorithm right now. We could fix this by doing a small proposal IRC

[tor-dev] Come work on Tor at Freedom of the Press Foundation!

Hello tor-devizens, Freedom of the Press Foundation is hosting a Mozilla-Ford Open Web Fellow for 2016. We have a lot of potential projects for our fellow to work on, depending on their skill set, but we have our fingers crossed for an applicant who is interested in working on Tor! SecureDrop, ou

Re: [tor-dev] Meeting about the new guard algorithm proposal (prop259)

Thank you. Another thing I'm interested in is how the proposed algorithm structure fits into current tor code. The proposed algorithm is: OPEN_CIRCUIT: context = ALGO_CHOOSE_ENTRY_GUARD_START(...) while True: entryGuard = ALGO_CHOOSE_ENTRY_GUARD_NEXT(context) circu

Re: [tor-dev] Core Tor / Network Team meeting time updates.

> On 17 Mar 2016, at 05:04, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > B. Try to pick two or more times such that everybody can make one or > the other. Try to solve disconnectedness by doing one or more of > these: > B1. Encourage everybody who can attend both to do so. > B2. Make Nick and Isabela atte

Re: [tor-dev] How to build a Router that will only allow Tor users

> On 16 Mar 2016, at 18:05, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > Am 2016-03-15 um 19:07 schrieb Rusty Bird: >> >>> What did *not* work, was starting Torbrowser. That's a hard requirement, >>> and before bebugging it through I ask: Do I miss something when I just >>> allow outgoing connections to >>> >

Re: [tor-dev] Core Tor / Network Team meeting time updates.

On 16 Mar (14:04:49), Nick Mathewson wrote: > Hi, all! > > I've got a doodle poll open on http://doodle.com/poll/nvx26m4cxspryf3e > to try to find the best time for a network team meeting. > > So far, it looks like our options are somewhat constrained, since we > have people who are living from U

Re: [tor-dev] Scheduling next proposal discussion meetings

> On 16 Mar 2016, at 12:12, Isabela wrote: > > Hi there, > > Quick reminder that tomorrow we will have prop 224 discussion: > > Proposal 224: Next-Generation Hidden Services in Tor > Wednesday, March 16th 1500 UTC > Must-have attendees: special, dgoulet, asn, teor I'm so sorry I missed this,

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

On 03/17/2016 06:02 PM, gunes acar wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > On 2016-03-16 11:58, Pierre Laperdrix wrote: >> Hi Gunes, >> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback! >> >> On 03/16/2016 03:30 PM, gunes acar wrote: >>> Hi Pierre, >>> >>> Thanks for the very well thought proposal! >>> >>> I'm curious about yo

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

Hi Pierre, thanks for this proposal. Gunes has already raised some good points and I won't repeat them here. This is part one of my feedback as I need a bit more time to think about the code example section. Pierre Laperdrix: > Hi Tor Community, > > My name is Pierre and I'm really interested in

Re: [tor-dev] Introducing Snowflake (webrtc pt)

Can a snowflake bridge also be hosted by running from command line only without an open browser? If it could be dumbed down for the integrator up to a "sudo apt-get install snowflage-bridge", this would open up for huge opportunities getting more bridges. Freedombox and related box projects could

Re: [tor-dev] "Not our bug" bugs

Griffin Boyce: > Hey all, > > There have been quite a few bug reports that discuss incompatibility with > various Firefox extensions and with websites. In most cases, I can't > replicate > these bugs -- either because the extension in question has been patched, > the > website reported no longer e

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

Hi Pierre, On 2016-03-16 11:58, Pierre Laperdrix wrote: > Hi Gunes, > > Thanks a lot for the feedback! > > On 03/16/2016 03:30 PM, gunes acar wrote: >> Hi Pierre, >> >> Thanks for the very well thought proposal! >> >> I'm curious about your ideas on the "returning device problem." EFF's >> Panop

Re: [tor-dev] Meeting about the new guard algorithm proposal (prop259)

Reinaldo de Souza Jr writes: > That would be great! > OK. Let's say Wednesday 15:00 UTC then! > I have a couple of questions that may help me better prepare for this > meeting: > > 1) In the proposal we assume the arrival of a new consensus as a > discrete event. Does this assumption match curr

Re: [tor-dev] Revisiting prop224 cells

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:25 AM, David Goulet wrote: > On 15 Mar (18:13:02), George Kadianakis wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I took a look at proposal 224 again, with the aim of revisiting the cell >> logic and format. >> >> Here are some matters that require discussion: >> For everybody who wasn't the

Re: [tor-dev] Interested in GSoC opportunity

Hi everyone, Once again thanks for the help so far, I just submitted the proposal on GSoC website. Inviting comments and feedback on the same. Also attaching a pdf copy of the same. Best Regards. *Deepankar Tyagi* *Projects & Resume : deepankar.io * On Tue, Mar 15, 2016

Re: [tor-dev] Meeting about the new guard algorithm proposal (prop259)

Sounds good to me, Iván and company? -- Ola Bini (https://olabini.se) "Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproje

Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC '16] Exitmap project - Introduction and request for comments

Hi Mridul, Thanks for your interest in exitmap. On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:26:01AM +0530, Mridul Malpotra wrote: > I will also be reading the tech report on Exitmap and would be > grateful if you can recommend any other resource(s) that I should be > referring to. Don't bother reading the techni

Re: [tor-dev] Notes from the prop224 proposal reading group

George Kadianakis writes: > [ text/plain ] > Hello, > > so we had a meeting about the future of "Next Generation Hidden Services" aka > prop224. > It was a good meeting. > Also, please see my torspec branch `prop224-fixes` for some torspec changes on prop224. My branch is sitting on top of the

Re: [tor-dev] Query regarding GSOC '16 - txtorcon

Hi Akash, Thanks for your interest! > How should i get started with txtorcon project ? > Are there any minor issues that i can work on as of now ? Probably the best way to get a feel for what would have to happen to support txaio (and thus asyncio) would be to take some method that currently us

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

Hi Pierre, Thanks for the very well thought proposal! I'm curious about your ideas on the "returning device problem." EFF's Panopticlick and AmIUnique.org use a combination of cookies and IP address to recognize returning users - so that their fingerprints are not "double-counted." Since these s

[tor-dev] [GSoC '16] Exitmap project - Introduction and request for comments

Hi everyone! I'm Mridul. I wish to apply for the Exitmap improvements project mentored by Dr. Philipp Winter for the Google Summer of Code 2016. My current IRC handle is mtyamantau. Contents 1. Introduction - About myself and experience with Tor 2. Exitmap - Current progre

Re: [tor-dev] Meeting about the new guard algorithm proposal (prop259)

This sounds great to me. The sooner the better. El 18/03/16 a las 07:17, Ola Bini escribió: > Sounds good to me, Iván and company? > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://li

Re: [tor-dev] Meeting about the new guard algorithm proposal (prop259)

That would be great! I have a couple of questions that may help me better prepare for this meeting: 1) In the proposal we assume the arrival of a new consensus as a discrete event. Does this assumption match current tor implementation, or is it more like "having at least X relay descriptors avai

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC'16 proposal: the Torprinter project (a Panopticlick-like website)

> Hi Pierre, on first glance looks like a nice proposal. Just a heads up > though that to be considered there needs to be a prospective mentor > for this project. Reaching out to tor-dev@ is a great first step and > hopefully it'll do the trick, but if it doesn't try asking on the > #tor-dev irc ch

Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC '16] Exitmap project - Introduction and request for comments

On 3/18/16, Mridul Malpotra wrote: > b. For testing active attacks, can there be modules developed > keeping other cleartext protocols like SNMP and Telnet in mind? Tor only supports TCP of course, however any cleartext application protocol using it is subject to snooping / modification.

Re: [tor-dev] What does TorBulkExitList.py return?

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:45 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out why a list from [TorBulkExitList.py] is so much > larger than what is seen in [exit-addresses]. Let's certainly not rule out the possibility of a bug. > Point in case: Earlier today the list from TorBul

[tor-dev] Notes from the prop267 meeting 2016-03-17

Hi, Here's a summary of what happened in the prop267 meeting in #tor-dev yesterday with Nick, Tom, Sebastian and myself. Sebastian started by summarising the proposal nicely. Topics discussed: - for bootstrap reasons we can't mandate using tor for all communication - SCT's or not: using SCT's in

[tor-dev] Notes from network team meeting Wed 3/16/2016

Hello there, this is something new we are trying out. The goal is to improve communication between team members, since we are spread out through many different time zones and is hard to get everyone together at the same time for discussions and updates. == Notes from little t Tor team - Wed March