Hi, all.
In our first stable 0.2.7 release (0.2.7.5), we had 39.5% line
coverage from our unit tests, and 66.1% from unit plus integration
tests.
In current 0.2.8, we have 46.8% from unit tests, and 69.7% from
integration tests.
In current master, we have 47.0% from unit tests, and 69.6% from
in
Hi Peter,
> That's great news! Any thoughts on the license? Can you place it into
> public domain?
I am not 100% sure but I think it will be the same as the current NTRU
implementation.
> Did the attachment get lost?
Sorry. Here are the data extracted from our paper. The final version will
be re
On 05/26/2016 03:47 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
> This is not possible, each authority only produces one consensus per hour.
> If a majority of authorities sign the same consensus, that consensus will be
> served by all authorities, and accepted by clients.
> Otherwise, there is a consen
On 2016-05-26 13:37, George Kadianakis wrote:
> str4d writes:
>
>> [ text/plain ]
>> On 27/04/16 22:31, grarpamp wrote:
>>> On 4/25/16, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2016, at 17:03, grarpamp wrote:
>
> FYI: The onioncat folks are interested in collaborating
> w
> On 26 May 2016, at 10:22, Nicolas Gailly wrote:
>
> A related issue for discussion is whether it could be problematic if
>there are two or more distinct collective signatures for a given
> directory
>consensus, and whether it is a problem if distinct subsets of 5 DAs
> might
>(perh
Hi all,
Finally, after a while, here's a revised version of the proposal :)
This version should clarify some of the previously discussed issues on
the thread:
+ the selection of the witnesses,
+ the evolution of the set of witnesses,
+ more details about exceptions
+ some basic bandwidth compu
str4d writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 27/04/16 22:31, grarpamp wrote:
>> On 4/25/16, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>>>
On 22 Apr 2016, at 17:03, grarpamp wrote:
FYI: The onioncat folks are interested in collaborating
with tor folks regarding prop224.
https://gitweb.
On 2016-05-01 01:44, str4d wrote:
> On 27/04/16 22:31, grarpamp wrote:
>> On 4/25/16, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>>>
On 22 Apr 2016, at 17:03, grarpamp wrote:
FYI: The onioncat folks are interested in collaborating
with tor folks regarding prop224.
https://gitweb
