[tor-dev] [GSoC16] Expand Nyx - Status Report 2

2016-06-17 Thread Sambuddha Basu
Hi everyone, This is the second status report for the 'Expand Nyx' project for GSoC 2016. I have been working on the following things: * Updated --log commandline argument and startup.events. Previously, arcane strings were entered for --log commandline argument and startup.events. This has now b

[tor-dev] Help complete the list of official & community projects

2016-06-17 Thread Nima Fatemi
Hi there, I'm working with some folks to compile a list of most active official and community projects we have. There are some projects listed on our volunteer page[1] but I'm not confident if the list is complete or even up to date. Please have a look at that page and let me know if your project

[tor-dev] Onionoo AS Name

2016-06-17 Thread Gareth Llewellyn
I've noticed a lot of ASNs are no longer showing their whois descr field in the Onionoo output. Is this expected? ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

[tor-dev] [GSOC 16] Ahmia status update #2

2016-06-17 Thread Ismael R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, I'm working on ahmia.fi, the hidden service search engine and you're reading status update #2. Since last time, here is what I've been working on: Improve project structure, code quality and documentation The three repositories I talk

[tor-dev] [GSoC] Tails Server - status report 3

2016-06-17 Thread segfault
Hi everyone, this is the third status report on the Tails Server GSoC project. I had to omit the previous report because personal difficulties were getting in the way. So here is what I achieved in the last four weeks: * Revamp the GUI * Replace the status panel with a config panel * Add a

Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC] CONIKS for Tor Messenger - 2nd status report

2016-06-17 Thread Marcela S. Melara
Hi Huy, Thanks for your 2nd status report! |> The source code of (3) and (4) is not pushed to the github repo yet |> since I’m still doing on these modules and they are not ready for |> integrating into the library. | | As much as possible, I would encourage to work in the open, and publish | ea

Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC] CONIKS for Tor Messenger - 2nd status report

2016-06-17 Thread Arlo Breault
> The source code of (3) and (4) is not pushed to the github repo yet > since I’m still doing on these modules and they are not ready for > integrating into the library. As much as possible, I would encourage to work in the open, and publish early and often. Even though the code may not be ready

[tor-dev] [GSOC16] Fingerprint Central - Status report n°2

2016-06-17 Thread Pierre Laperdrix
Hi everyone, Here is my second status report for my GSOC project. A little reminder that the repo is located on GitHub: https://github.com/plaperdr/fp-central 1 - I have progressed faster than I expected in the last two weeks. Here is everything that I have done: - Storage of fingerprints in a Mo

[tor-dev] [GSoC] CONIKS for Tor Messenger - 2nd status report

2016-06-17 Thread Huy Vu Quoc
Hi everyone, This is my second status report on the CONIKS for Tor Messenger project. During the last two weeks I’ve been working on several things: 1. Continue implementing the Merkle prefix tree module and fix issues based on comments from Marcela, Arlo and Ismail. These are still some works n

Re: [tor-dev] We need a new RPM maintainer

2016-06-17 Thread Ondrej Mikle
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Henry de Valence wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:19:15AM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, nusenu wrote: > > > What is the Tor Project's motivation for providing RPMs (instead of > > > relying on the RPM distro maintainer)? >

Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC 2016] Orfox - Report 2

2016-06-17 Thread Nathan Freitas
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Tom Ritter wrote: > On 16 June 2016 at 18:45, Amogh Pradeep wrote: > Is a code audit the most efficient and reliable way to look for proxy > leaks? (At least at this stage?) I think he means a few things by this, or at least we have a few tasks underway: - men

Re: [tor-dev] We need a new RPM maintainer

2016-06-17 Thread Henry de Valence
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:19:15AM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, nusenu wrote: > > What is the Tor Project's motivation for providing RPMs (instead of > > relying on the RPM distro maintainer)? > > Frankly, I don't know. I don't actually install Tor from package