Nick Mathewson:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
>> Nick Mathewson:
>>> Hi, all!
>>>
>>> I've seen a couple of emails from people looking into new ways to do
>>> naming for onion services. That's great! Before anybody gets too
>>> far, I'd like to send this quick note to let
First Jeremy, thanks for engaging with Tor! Some kind of solution is going to
be needed. But I think if we carefully leverage either DNS or URLs (I prefer
the later but that's just me) then we can easily support multiple different
naming systems without them running rough shod over each other.
Great to see the community making progress with post-quantum handshakes.
But I'm wondering what's going to happen with Proposals #269 and #270. #269
seems to allow any post-quantum algorithm to be used in the hybrid with
NTRUEncrypt and NewHope being specified as two options (presumably other
op
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> Nick Mathewson:
>> Hi, all!
>>
>> I've seen a couple of emails from people looking into new ways to do
>> naming for onion services. That's great! Before anybody gets too
>> far, I'd like to send this quick note to let you know that integratin
