Re: [tor-dev] Post-quantum proposals #269 and #270

2016-08-05 Thread isis agora lovecruft
lu...@tutanota.com transcribed 3.2K bytes: > Great to see the community making progress with post-quantum handshakes. Hello, Thanks! :) > But I'm wondering what's going to happen with Proposals #269 and #270. #269 > seems to allow any post-quantum algorithm to be used in the hybrid with > NTRUEn

Re: [tor-dev] Post-quantum proposals #269 and #270

2016-08-05 Thread Henry de Valence
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:32:43PM +0100, lu...@tutanota.com wrote: > Great to see the community making progress with post-quantum handshakes. But > I'm wondering what's going to happen with Proposals #269 and #270. If you consult the current proposal-status.txt in the torspec repository [0], yo

[tor-dev] CollecTor will soon serve descriptors that don't pass metrics-lib's parser

2016-08-05 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello CollecTor data consumers, note: if you don't know what CollecTor is or if you have never used CollecTor data before, you can safely stop reading now and enjoy your Friday. But in case you're now curious what CollecTor is, feel free to take a lo

Re: [tor-dev] Post-quantum proposals #269 and #270

2016-08-05 Thread Jeff Burdges
I suspect the two known families you "do not want to rule out" are SIDH schemes and LWE schemes with no ring structure, like Frodo. At present SIDH is too slow and LWE keys are too big, but both could improve dramatically over the next several years. Jeff signature.asc Description: This is