Re: [tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

2016-10-13 Thread teor
> On 14 Oct 2016, at 08:03, blacklight . wrote: > > I would love to help, but can you also volunteer when cannot give ALL the > feedback? > On 14 Oct 2016, at 11:30, ng0 wrote: > > Do all these task have to apply to make the test valid/useful for you? > On one of my test systems - I contribu

Re: [tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

2016-10-13 Thread ng0
isab...@riseup.net writes: > Hello Tor community! > > The Core Tor Team would like to improve our release process by getting > it more tested so bugs are found earlier, so stable releases can get out > faster and without any big bugs. > > During Tor's Meeting in Seattle a couple of weeks ago, we d

Re: [tor-dev] Revisiting prop224 client authorization

2016-10-13 Thread s7r
Hi, George Kadianakis wrote: [SNIP] > >Some further questions here: > >i) Should we fake the client-auth-desc-key blob in case client > authorization > is not enabled? Otherwise, we leak to the HSDir whether client auth is > enabled. The drawback here is the desc size increa

Re: [tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

2016-10-13 Thread blacklight .
I would love to help, but can you also volunteer when cannot give ALL the feedback? On Oct 13, 2016 10:53 PM, "Matt Traudt" wrote: > Isabela / Core Tor > > I'd love to help. I use 99% Linux and will be able help with everything > you listed. > > I'm pastly on trac and oftc. > > Matt > > isab...@

Re: [tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

2016-10-13 Thread Matt Traudt
Isabela / Core Tor I'd love to help. I use 99% Linux and will be able help with everything you listed. I'm pastly on trac and oftc. Matt isab...@riseup.net: > > What we are asking volunteers: > > * Validate release signature/checksum > > * Does it build with _no_ Warnings? > > * Does

[tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

2016-10-13 Thread isabela
Hello Tor community! The Core Tor Team would like to improve our release process by getting it more tested so bugs are found earlier, so stable releases can get out faster and without any big bugs. During Tor's Meeting in Seattle a couple of weeks ago, we discussed this topic and decided to organ

Re: [tor-dev] performance of CREATE/CREATED handshake

2016-10-13 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:05:05 +0200 Rob van der Hoeven wrote: > This is what I was looking for. Running the benchmark on two very > different systems was revealing: on my Pentium G620 the ntor > server-side time was ~300 uSec, an Allwinner A20 system completed the > server-side code in ~10600 uSec.

Re: [tor-dev] performance of CREATE/CREATED handshake

2016-10-13 Thread Rob van der Hoeven
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 13:57 +, Yawning Angel wrote: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:37:24 +0200 > Rob van der Hoeven wrote: > > 2) The average CPU-time it takes to perform a CREATE/CREATED > > handshake. > > This "depends" entirely on your CPU and which handshake is used, though > I don't particular