[tor-dev] [prop269] [prop270] Ideas from Tor Meeting Discussion on Post-Quantum Crypto

Hey hey, In summary of the breakaway group we had last Saturday on post-quantum cryptography in Tor, there were a few potentially good ideas I wrote down, just in case they didn't make it into the meeting notes: * A client should be able to configure "I require my entire circuit to have PQ

[tor-dev] Tor in a safer language: Network team update from Amsterdam

Hi there tor-dev, as an update to those who didn't have the chance to meet with us in Amsterdam or those who haven't followed the efforts to rely on C less, here's what happened at the "let's not fight about Go versus Rust, but talk about how to migrate Tor to a safer language" session and what

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC 2017 - Project "Crash Reporter for Tor Browser"

On 31 March 2017 at 10:27, Nur-Magomed wrote: >> I think we'd want to enhance this form. IIRC the 'Details' view is >> small and obtuse and it's not easy to review. I'm not saying we >> _should_ create these features, but here are a few I brainstormed: > > Yes, actually that

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC 2017 - Project "Crash Reporter for Tor Browser"

> I think we'd want to enhance this form. IIRC the 'Details' view is > small and obtuse and it's not easy to review. I'm not saying we > _should_ create these features, but here are a few I brainstormed: Yes, actually that form only shows "Key: Value" list, we can break it down in several