Re: [tor-dev] Contents of tor-dev digest...

2017-04-10 Thread Mike Guidry
I didn't write the paper for this list specifically. It requires performing DDoS attacks. Your the one trolling someone in reality. I am not going to go out of my way to spend time when realistically its quite simple to perform. If you don't want to use NTP, and other factors to performing

Re: [tor-dev] Contents of tor-dev digest...

2017-04-10 Thread dawuud
> I'm not presenting a scientific paper. Its an actual method that works. You must learn how to articulate the idea without muddling it with all kinds of other irrelevant stuff. Nobody mentioned scientific papers. Are you saying that you don't read papers describing attacks on Tor? They are

Re: [tor-dev] Tracing TCP Connections online..

2017-04-10 Thread Mike Guidry
re: grarpamp I am writing a possible countermeasure which uses transactional requests. You submit entire requests which are processed by the exit node. Several other situations can take place while routing to the exit node. It would also only require exit nodes to have updated to the newer

Re: [tor-dev] Contents of tor-dev digest...

2017-04-10 Thread Mike Guidry
I'm not presenting a scientific paper. Its an actual method that works. You can DDoS various networks to compare against active connections on TOR, and otherwise... On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:22 PM, dawuud wrote: > > > Dear Mike Guidry, > > My reply here is snarky but I

Re: [tor-dev] Control-port filtering: can it have a reasonable threat model?

2017-04-10 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:35:24 +0400 meejah wrote: > Obviously as per my other post I agree with fragmented / limited views > given to "real" applications of the control-port. However, personally > I don't see the point of implementing this in 'tor' itself -- existing >

Re: [tor-dev] Tracing TCP Connections online..

2017-04-10 Thread dawuud
hella old news. oh look here's POC for end to end correlation https://var.thejh.net/git/?p=detour.git;a=blob;f=README but why bother chatting about this since it's explicitly not in Tor's threat model to protect against a global passive adversary? if you want to protect against that then look

[tor-dev] Tracing TCP Connections online..

2017-04-10 Thread grarpamp
re: "tcp_tracing_internet.pdf" This appears to describe an active network modulation attack (node DoS). Either hammer tree on nodes of the expected path and trace the modulation, or on all but the expected path to find unmodulated. It generally requires GPA, deploying nodes, or being one end of

Re: [tor-dev] Contents of tor-dev digest...

2017-04-10 Thread dawuud
Dear Mike Guidry, My reply here is snarky but I just cannot help it. Please consider me a friend that is snarky rather than an enemy or an asshole. I am finding it very hard to read. It is *extremely* annoying that you present your definition of "hacking" at the beginning and then go on to

Re: [tor-dev] Control-port filtering: can it have a reasonable threat model?

2017-04-10 Thread meejah
anonym writes: >> It allows "GETINFO onions/current", which can expose a list of every >> onion service locally hosted, even those not launched through >> onionshare. > I think this can be disallowed; in fact, when looking at the > onionshare and stem sources I don't see why

Re: [tor-dev] Contents of tor-dev digest...

2017-04-10 Thread Mike Guidry
I am not trolling you. I attached a PDF which explains how to trace TOR connections over the internet. It is not a joke. I have some other vulnerabilities at that URL I am releasing. I'll include here: Michael Guidry March 15, 2017 Tracing connections online from the virtual landscape to the

Re: [tor-dev] Control-port filtering: can it have a reasonable threat model?

2017-04-10 Thread anonym
Nick Mathewson: > Hi! > > As you may know, the Tor control port assumes that if you can > authenticate to it, you are completely trusted with respect to the Tor > instance you have authenticated to. But there are a few programs and > tools that filter access to the Tor control port, in an

Re: [tor-dev] Feedback Extension for Tor Browser

2017-04-10 Thread Sukhbir Singh
Hello, > Is the project 'Feedback Extension for Tor Browser' still a part of GSoC > 2017? I have already submitted a proposal and would like to work on it. > Please help. Yes, it is still a part of GSoC. We will let you know if we have any questions or if there is any feedback on the proposal