Hello all,
Is there an existing Tor proposal you'd like to discuss? Please use
the following pad to nominate and vote for proposals for discussion.
https://pad.riseup.net/p/Pxo2fQiiaSWo
We'll be reviving our proposal discussion meetings soon, likely at the
beginning of January once people have
Hello all,
What: A proposal discussion meeting for prop#249 "Allow CREATE cells with
>505 bytes of handshake data". [0]
Who: This proposal is likely of interest to those hoping to integrate newer,
non-ECC-based, circuit-layer handshakes into the Tor protocol.
When: Next week, on
On 8 December 2017 at 15:48, teor wrote:
>
> On 9 Dec 2017, at 03:27, Tom Ritter wrote:
>
>>> We introduce a new HTTP header called "Onion-Location" with the exact same
>>> restrictions and semantics as the Location HTTP header.
>>
>> For reference, this is
On 9 Dec 2017, at 03:27, Tom Ritter wrote:
>> We introduce a new HTTP header called "Onion-Location" with the exact same
>> restrictions and semantics as the Location HTTP header.
>
> For reference, this is https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.2
Because this is a
Nick Mathewson writes:
>We define a new "GETINFO status/hibernation" to inspect the
>current hibernation state. Possible values are:
> - "live"
> - "idle:control"
> - "idle:no-activity"
> - "sleep:control"
> - "sleep:accounting"
> -
On 8 December 2017 at 09:06, George Kadianakis wrote:
> As discussed in this mailing list and in IRC, I'm posting a subsequent
> version of this proposal. Basic improvements:
> - Uses a new custom HTTP header, instead of Alt-Svc or Location.
> - Does not do auto-redirect; it
As discussed in this mailing list and in IRC, I'm posting a subsequent
version of this proposal. Basic improvements:
- Uses a new custom HTTP header, instead of Alt-Svc or Location.
- Does not do auto-redirect; it instead suggests the onion based on
antonella's mockup: