Re: [tor-dev] txtorcon 18.0.1

2018-07-01 Thread meejah
Iain Learmonth writes: > Is it possible for you to make a GitHub "release" for 18.0.1? For the > Debian packaging I fetch the signatures from here and verify them, which > doesn't work if you've only tagged the release. Ah, sorry yes I missed this step. The GitHub release is updated. thanks,

Re: [tor-dev] txtorcon 18.0.1

2018-07-01 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 01/07/18 16:30, dawuud wrote: > What's a github release? > I think you mean a commit which is tagged and I'm > pretty sure meejah tags release commits. I mean what GitHub calls a "release" which is different to a tag. It allows me to base the Debian packaging on a signed tarball from

Re: [tor-dev] txtorcon 18.0.1

2018-07-01 Thread dawuud
What's a github release? I think you mean a commit which is tagged and I'm pretty sure meejah tags release commits. On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 04:09:26PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote: > Hi meejah, > > On 30/06/18 06:11, meejah wrote: > > Unfortunately there was a problem when parsing onion services

Re: [tor-dev] txtorcon 18.0.1

2018-07-01 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi meejah, On 30/06/18 06:11, meejah wrote: > Unfortunately there was a problem when parsing onion services on > Python2, which is fixed by txtorcon 18.0.1 Is it possible for you to make a GitHub "release" for 18.0.1? For the Debian packaging I fetch the signatures from here and verify them,

Re: [tor-dev] the consequences of deprecating debian alpha repos with every new major branch

2018-07-01 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 30/06/18 15:42, nusenu wrote: > but maybe someone else would be willing to invoke a > "ln" commands everytime a new new alpha repo is born. > > tor-alpha-jessie -> tor-experimental-0.3.4.x-jessie As an alternative strategy, symbolic links for old alpha repositories point to the current

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Check Maxmind GeoIP DB before distributing

2018-07-01 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 30/06/18 12:53, Jaskaran Singh wrote: > 0. Motivation and Overview > We're using Maxmind's (company registered in the US) GeoIP Database, > which is not just antithetical to the philosophy that one should not > totally rely on a service/software for all needs, but has some serious >