Re: [tor-dev] Tor Relay Guide Disagreements

2018-08-03 Thread nusenu
> Going forward I'd propose the following to minimize the fraction and overhead: > > I assume you maintain: > /TorRelayGuide-ptbr > /TorRelayGuide/OpenBSD > /TorRelayGuide/NetBSD > /TorRelayGuide/DragonFlyBSD > > > I'll keep maintaining: > /TorRelayGuide > /TorRelayGuide/DebianUbuntu > /TorRelay

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Relay Guide Disagreements

2018-08-03 Thread grarpamp
> /TorRelayGuide > /TorRelayGuide/DebianUbuntu The former, in context wiith the latter, cannot be treated as both a file and a directory (hier) by web mirror / archvers such as wget onto disk. And wiki / trac exports aren't available either :( So instead push the page down into the hier, thus ensu

[tor-dev] Tor Relay Guide Disagreements

2018-08-03 Thread nusenu
Hi Vinícius, (moving this discussion to the tor-dev mailing list since this isn't limited to the OpenBSD ticket scope https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26619#comment:14 ) Vinícius wrote: > you [nusenu] took over /FreeBSD, /BSDUpdates, and /OpenBSD and enabled the > 'read- > only

Re: [tor-dev] WTF-PAD and the future

2018-08-03 Thread Mike Perry
Hi Yawning! Yawning Angel: > On 08/02/2018 08:26 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > > Should we consider recommending basket2 also? > > No. > > > Is anyone running bridges with it? Probably not, I guess :/. > > No one should be, it is incomplete, buggy, and needs a re-design. Thanks for the heads up. >

Re: [tor-dev] WTF-PAD and the future

2018-08-03 Thread Yawning Angel
On 08/02/2018 08:26 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > Should we consider recommending basket2 also? No. > Is anyone running bridges with it? Probably not, I guess :/. No one should be, it is incomplete, buggy, and needs a re-design. As a side note, I question the utility of a PT that has the AGPL3 networ