Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

2019-02-25 Thread teor
> On 23 Feb 2019, at 02:10, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi all, > > On 22/02/2019 12:29, Nick Mathewson wrote: >>> I had to read this paragraph twice to understand it. >>> The way it's written, it sounds like we're doing a bad thing. >>> (Until I read the "security" section at

Re: [tor-dev] Anti-censorship discussion with Briar devs

2019-02-25 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 2019-02-22 17:05, Cecylia Bocovich wrote: > [...] Thanks for summarizing that conversation here! > The main thing they would like on the metrics side is up-to-date > information about which PT works in which country and where PTs are > needed at all in order to make quick and easy decisions