Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

2019-02-26 Thread teor
> On 27 Feb 2019, at 02:30, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > On 25/02/2019 23:30, teor wrote: >> Looks good to me, let's merge it as an "accepted" proposal? > > Is there some action I should take here like opening a PR or does > someone just pick up the text and commit it? You can open a trac ticket

Re: [tor-dev] Sending multiple streams throuh a single Tor circuit

2019-02-26 Thread meejah
Piyush Kumar Sharma writes: > The application is doing a voice call using mumble. Usually that error means the server couldn't be reached from the exit, I believe. That could be for many reasons. Did it ever succeed? How many exits did it try? -- meejah

Re: [tor-dev] Sending multiple streams throuh a single Tor circuit

2019-02-26 Thread Mirimir
On 02/26/2019 02:02 PM, Piyush Kumar Sharma wrote: > The application is doing a voice call using mumble. Some years ago, I got mumble to work very well via Tor. On the mumble server, I ran an OpenVPN onion (in TCP mode, obviously). Users connected via Tor to the OpenVPN onion, and then used

Re: [tor-dev] Sending multiple streams throuh a single Tor circuit

2019-02-26 Thread Piyush Kumar Sharma
The application is doing a voice call using mumble. On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, 02:21 meejah, wrote: > Piyush Kumar Sharma writes: > > > Are there any possible reasons as to why this might be happening and > > any possible fixes for this situation? > > What is your application doing? > > -- > meejah

Re: [tor-dev] Sending multiple streams throuh a single Tor circuit

2019-02-26 Thread meejah
Piyush Kumar Sharma writes: > Are there any possible reasons as to why this might be happening and > any possible fixes for this situation? What is your application doing? -- meejah ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-dev] Sending multiple streams throuh a single Tor circuit

2019-02-26 Thread Piyush Kumar Sharma
The problem got resolved, once I closely analyzed the tor INFO logs. Main problem was that the exit nodes in the circuit were refusing connections due to their exit policies, because our application ran on some random ports. Running out application on tor exit supported ports worked for a while.

Re: [tor-dev] Anti-censorship discussion with Briar devs

2019-02-26 Thread Torsten Grote
On 2/26/19 11:19 AM, Georg Koppen wrote: > I think we should be able to provide that with our Tor Browser builds > once we have all the PT pieces sorted out (which is rather soon). That would be nice! > So, probably the easiest way would then be to just copy the respective > binaries we produce

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Don't include package fingerprints in consensus documents

2019-02-26 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 25/02/2019 23:30, teor wrote: > Looks good to me, let's merge it as an "accepted" proposal? Is there some action I should take here like opening a PR or does someone just pick up the text and commit it? Thanks, Iain. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [tor-dev] Anti-censorship discussion with Briar devs

2019-02-26 Thread Georg Koppen
Cecylia Bocovich: > Hi, > > I just had a really great conversation with some of the developers at > Briar about the recent work they've done in integrating some pluggable > transports into their messaging application. I thought I would summarize > some key points from the conversation here. In

Re: [tor-dev] GSOC 2019 tor project participation

2019-02-26 Thread Pili Guerra
Hi, Just a quick note to let you know that unfortunately we have not been selected for GSoC 2019 :( We would love it if you could still contribute to Tor Project outside of the GSoC program, but we understand that it can be hard to balance work and studies. Thank you for your interest in

Re: [tor-dev] xp + T

2019-02-26 Thread Georg Koppen
Iain Learmonth: > Hi, > > On 13/02/2019 16:56, n...@neelc.org wrote: >> I don't think this is the right mailing list. > > This is entirely the correct mailing list as it is discussing a > technical policy of the network team. I am not sure whether that's actually the intention of the original