Re: [tor-dev] Comments on proposal 279 (Name API)

meejah wrote: > > It was suggested I post this to tor-dev; I prototyped a small thing > that allows the prop-279 APIs to be tested against actual-Tor without > changing Tor. That is, it does the "abuse the control-protocol" thing > but speaks to prop-279 style subprocesses. >

[tor-dev] GSoC 17 | Name System API for Tor Onion Services

I have created a proposal at http://dl.pickfire.tk/tor/proposal.md Feel free to review it and give comments, python script still WIP. ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Comments on proposal 279 (Name API)

Hi, I would like to do some addition as well. Section 2.3. System configuration [TORRC] - Do we really need a priority list? - Should we just make a priority based on the ordering? Section 2.3.1. Tor name resolution logic - Should tor check the based on regex? - How should it reponds when is

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC 17 | Name System API for Tor Onion Services

George Kadianakis <desnac...@riseup.net> wrote: > Pickfire <pickf...@riseup.net> writes: > > > I am Ivan Tham. Currently studying in Computer Science in APIIT Malaysia. I > > am > > interested particapate in Google Summer of Code 2017 under tor > >