Re: [tor-dev] [prop269] Further changes to the hybrid handshake proposal (and NTor)

2016-10-18 Thread John M. Schanck
Hi BU, bustao...@cryptolounge.net wrote: > Perhaps my question is related to Michaels question, but above removing A, X, > Y and server ID leaves the possibility of a person-in-the-middle who by > manipulating public keys (resend 2A, instead of A, 2X instead of X, 2Y instead > of Y) can force two

Re: [tor-dev] [prop269] Further changes to the hybrid handshake proposal (and NTor)

2016-10-17 Thread John M. Schanck
Hi Michael, Michael Rogers wrote: > If we're concerned with the server choosing its public material in such > a way as to bias the entropy extraction, does that mean that in this > case, the attacker is the server, and therefore the server's public > material shouldn't be included in the salt?