Re: [tor-dev] Question on Tor Design (current and maybe past and future)

ng0 transcribed 3.2K bytes: > Hi, > > Jonathan Marquardt transcribed 2.1K bytes: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:59:34AM +, ng0 wrote: > > > can one of the core developers tell me if there exists > > > a current summary of the design of Tor? > > > &

Re: [tor-dev] Question on Tor Design (current and maybe past and future)

Hi, Jonathan Marquardt transcribed 2.1K bytes: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:59:34AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > can one of the core developers tell me if there exists > > a current summary of the design of Tor? > > I’m not one of the core developers, but I know where the design do

[tor-dev] Question on Tor Design (current and maybe past and future)

interested in what you use today, where you are heading (or what you are considering for the future) and maybe reasons why past designs were changed. Best regards, ng0 -- GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/ WWW: https://ng0

Re: [tor-dev] anonbib

Grothoff before I can say wether we as a group agree or not. My opinion is that it's good and reusable at our side without causing too much confusion about content and location. -- GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org

Re: [tor-dev] anonbib

Roger Dingledine transcribed 2.5K bytes: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:58:35PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to > > implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib. > > Great. > > See also the censorbib, for ano

[tor-dev] anonbib

to a minimum. What do you think? -- ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://ng0.infotropique.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ tor-dev

[tor-dev] RFC: porting torbrowser (was: Re: GNU Guix and Tor Browser Packaging)

rg/tor-browser.git/tree/browser/app/profile/firefox.js?h=tor-browser-45.8.0esr-7.0-1#n1511 ng0 transcribed 3.4K bytes: > ban...@openmailbox.org transcribed 1.9K bytes: > > There is a serious Tor Browser packaging effort [3][4] being done by ng0 > > (GNUnet dev) for the GNU Guix [0] pa

Re: [tor-dev] Tor in a safer language: Network team update from Amsterdam

z...@manian.org transcribed 12K bytes: > Rust seems like the best available choice for Tor in a safer language. > > Rust has several issues with securely obtaining a Rust toolchain that the > Tor community should be attentive to. Interesting development, but logical. Leaving the obvious issues

Re: [tor-dev] GNU Guix and Tor Browser Packaging

ban...@openmailbox.org transcribed 1.9K bytes: > There is a serious Tor Browser packaging effort [3][4] being done by ng0 > (GNUnet dev) for the GNU Guix [0] package manager. GNU Guix supports Eh, now that the cat is out of the bag (cat's don't belong into bags anyway), I think I have

Re: [tor-dev] OnionGatherer: evaluating status of hidden services

Massimo La Morgia transcribed 6.7K bytes: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:39 PM, David Fifield > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:58:55PM +0100, Massimo La Morgia wrote: > > > we are a research group at Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. We do > > research on > > >

Re: [tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

teor <teor2...@gmail.com> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > >> On 14 Oct 2016, at 08:03, blacklight . <pandakaas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I would love to help, but can you also volunteer when cannot give ALL the >> feedback? > >> On

Re: [tor-dev] Call for help on testing core tor releases

or > > ps: email from Nick on 0.2.9 freeze dates if you miss it > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-October/011513.html > > _______ > tor-dev mailing list > tor-dev@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [tor-dev] stem is now available through Guix

Hi, Damian Johnson <ata...@torproject.org> writes: > Hi ng0, that's neat! Is there a stem-specific guix page to link to? > The general package page is large enough it hosed my browser for quite > a while, and its link is for a multi-thousand line file... > > http://git.