Re: [tor-dev] 24 hours worth of BridgeDB usage metrics

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote: > You say that you're planning to add aggregate statistics like numbers by > distributor without drilling down to transports or countries. Keep in > mind that this is going to reduce the noise that you added when rounding > up to

Re: [tor-dev] 24 hours worth of BridgeDB usage metrics

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Rick Huebner wrote: > Could some metrics be added to summarize how the bridges and queries > are distributed across the hashrings? Thanks for this suggestion. I agree that it would be helpful and I'll look into incorporating it into the metrics. Cheers,

Re: [tor-dev] 24 hours worth of BridgeDB usage metrics

On 2019-07-30 00:01, Philipp Winter wrote: > [...] > > After a cursory look at the numbers, I would like to aggregate the data, > to make it easier to compare distributors, transports, and countries. > For example: how do moat, email, and HTTPS rank in popularity? I'll > improve the patch to

Re: [tor-dev] 24 hours worth of BridgeDB usage metrics

That's awesome, and will shine a lot of light on user demand patterns and how well things are actually working through various channels. Could some metrics be added to summarize how the bridges and queries are distributed across the hashrings? As in, at the end of the day, roughly how many

[tor-dev] 24 hours worth of BridgeDB usage metrics

Over at , we are working on having BridgeDB export metrics. The patch is almost done and I deployed the work-in-progress code on BridgeDB, so we can take a look at the metrics and think of ways to improve them. The metrics format encodes the approximate number