On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:30 AM Tom Ritter wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 10:37, George Kadianakis wrote:
> > So are you suggesting that we can still do SOCKS error codes? But as
> > David said, some of the errors we care about are after the descriptor
> > fetch, so how would we do those?
>
>
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 10:37, George Kadianakis wrote:
> So are you suggesting that we can still do SOCKS error codes? But as
> David said, some of the errors we care about are after the descriptor
> fetch, so how would we do those?
Only 'X'F3' Onion Service Rendezvous Failed' - right?
I think D
David Goulet writes:
> On 08 Oct (19:49:34), Matthew Finkel wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:46 PM Nick Mathewson wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 1:35 PM Tom Ritter wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 18:33, Tom Ritter wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 09:23, Tom
On 08 Oct (19:49:34), Matthew Finkel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:46 PM Nick Mathewson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 1:35 PM Tom Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 18:33, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 09:23, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > > > > Or...
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:46 PM Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 1:35 PM Tom Ritter wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 18:33, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 09:23, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > > > Or... something else? Very interested in what David/asn think sin
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 1:35 PM Tom Ritter wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 18:33, Tom Ritter wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 09:23, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > > Or... something else? Very interested in what David/asn think since
> > > they worked on #30382 ...
> >
> > I never updated this thre
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 18:33, Tom Ritter wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 09:23, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > Or... something else? Very interested in what David/asn think since
> > they worked on #30382 ...
>
> I never updated this thread after discussing with people on irc.
>
> So the implementation o
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 09:23, Tom Ritter wrote:
> Or... something else? Very interested in what David/asn think since
> they worked on #30382 ...
I never updated this thread after discussing with people on irc.
So the implementation of
SOCKS-error-code-for-an-Onion-Service-needs-auth implementat
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 13:42, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> On 6/21/19 8:50 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> > The attached is a draft proposal for allowing tor to lie to an
> > application about the SOCKS connection enabling it to send data
> > optimistically.
> >
> > It's going to need some fleshing out in ways I
On 6/21/19 8:50 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> The attached is a draft proposal for allowing tor to lie to an
> application about the SOCKS connection enabling it to send data
> optimistically.
>
> It's going to need some fleshing out in ways I am not familiar with,
> but I wanted to get something out to
I'll add that a cypherpunk has been testing a very simple patch
implementing this behavior for a few months and not seen adverse
effects:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/5915/tor-optimistic-data.patch
(Although I propose to not include the error page component.)
-tom
O
The attached is a draft proposal for allowing tor to lie to an
application about the SOCKS connection enabling it to send data
optimistically.
It's going to need some fleshing out in ways I am not familiar with,
but I wanted to get something out to start as we think that this is
probably the best
12 matches
Mail list logo
