On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In an attempt to make Pluggable Transports more accessible to other
> people, and to have a spec that is more applicable and useful to other
> projects that seek to use Pluggable Transports for circumvention, I have
> drafted a
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:04:24 -0500
Brandon Wiley wrote:
> Excellent work on the rewrite. To summarize for those that do not
> have time to read the whole document, it's the same spec, it's just
> been rewritten to read more clearly. I think it's a great improvement
> over the previous version.
>
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:27:53 -0400
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Any small or big changes to highlight that push us to the more
> accessible goal?
Well, it emphasizes that it's generic, gives a better view of the
architecture, and should be usable by anyone competent (unless my
rewrite is bad) to add
Excellent work on the rewrite. To summarize for those that do not have time
to read the whole document, it's the same spec, it's just been rewritten to
read more clearly. I think it's a great improvement over the previous
version.
I have two suggestions:
Section 4, "Tor Configuration", I think sh
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 09:19 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In an attempt to make Pluggable Transports more accessible to other
> people, and to have a spec that is more applicable and useful to other
> projects that seek to use Pluggable Transports for circumvention, I have
> drafted
his effort continues to signal the Tor community's belief
in open, free(dom), collaboration in the space.
Hats off !
Hugo
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:19:01 +
From: Yawning Angel
To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-dev] Pluggable Transports
Hello all,
In an attempt to make Pluggable Transports more accessible to other
people, and to have a spec that is more applicable and useful to other
projects that seek to use Pluggable Transports for circumvention, I have
drafted a re-write of the spec.
This is not intended to alter existing beh
