On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> Here's
Incidentally, the canonical location for proposals is the torspec
repository. Since this email went out, I've applied some fixes to the
proposal to fix up some mistakes in it, and more mistakes I made. The
latest versi
Thanks Esfandiar. I had to run off for an hour and inadevertently sent
my message before I had finished composing it, leaving a munged
impression. My intended point was that the whole story has quite a bit
to it beyond simply tweaking MQV. As you noted, that story has even
more to it than what I s
Am 20.11.2013 um 18:19 schrieb Paul Syverson :
> These authors found a
> vulnerability in that protocol, improved on it, and proved their
> protocol secure.
Actually, Ian Goldberg, Douglas Stebila, and Berkant Ustaoglu found the
vulnerability in Lasse and Paul's protocol [1], improved it, and pr
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:36:30AM -0800, Watson Ladd wrote:
> Is it just me, or is this protocol MQV with the client generating a
> fake long term key?
Well yeah sort of, but the "details" are crucial. In "Improving
efficiency and simplicity of Tor circuit establishment and hidden
services" (avai
Is it just me, or is this protocol MQV with the client generating a
fake long term key?
Sincerely,
Watson Ladd
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Hi, all!
Here's Esfandiar Mohammadi's proposal for the Ace handshake. It should
have been added as a numbered proposal back in July; I think I lost
track of everything while the dev meeting was happening.
Please let me know if you have more proposals that should be assigned
numbers but haven't go
