Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2017-06-09 Thread Roger Dingledine
Hi folks, Like I did for prop#271, I've done some fixes to prop#247 when I did my recent reread. Here were the easy fixes: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-commits/2017-June/123303.html And below are the parts that I shouldn't just unilaterally fix without the authors of the proposal be

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2016-01-07 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > Mike Perry: >> Mike Perry: >> > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's >> > comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you >> > commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-11-10 Thread Mike Perry
Mike Perry: > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your > thoughts into account. Ok, I've now folded in our discussion fr

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-11-09 Thread Mike Perry
Aaron Johnson: > Hi Mike, > > Here are some specific comments on the proposal, most of which I > didn’t mention at the session yesterday. > > Sec. 2: “When a hidden service picks its guard nodes, it also picks > two additional sets of middle nodes `second_guard_set` and > `third_guard_set` of siz

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-10-02 Thread Aaron Johnson
Hi Mike, Here are some specific comments on the proposal, most of which I didn’t mention at the session yesterday. Sec. 2: “When a hidden service picks its guard nodes, it also picks two additional sets of middle nodes `second_guard_set` and `third_guard_set` of size NUM_SECOND_GUARDS and NUM_

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Perry
George Kadianakis: > Mike Perry writes: > > > Mike Perry: > >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your > >> thou

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Perry
George Kadianakis: > Mike Perry writes: > > > Mike Perry: > >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your > >> thou

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-14 Thread George Kadianakis
Mike Perry writes: > Mike Perry: >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your >> thoughts into account. > > I spent ye

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-14 Thread George Kadianakis
Mike Perry writes: > Mike Perry: >> I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's >> comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you >> commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your >> thoughts into account. > > I spent ye

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-14 Thread s7r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I like this very much. See comments inline. On 9/14/2015 2:07 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on > everyone's comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please > have a look if you commented o

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-14 Thread Mike Perry
Mike Perry: > I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's > comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you > commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your > thoughts into account. I spent yet more time thinking about the

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul and Proposal: Padding Negotiation

2015-09-13 Thread Mike Perry
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor: > > > On 14 Sep 2015, at 09:07, Mike Perry > > wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > 4. Security concerns and mitigations > > > > 4.1. Mitigating fingerprinting of new HS circuits > > > > By pinning the middle nodes of rendezvous circuits, we make it > > easier for all ho

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul and Proposal: Padding Negotiation

2015-09-13 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 14 Sep 2015, at 09:07, Mike Perry wrote: > > ... > > > 4. Security concerns and mitigations > > 4.1. Mitigating fingerprinting of new HS circuits > > By pinning the middle nodes of rendezvous circuits, we make it > easier for all hops of the circuit to detect that they are part of a >

[tor-dev] Proposal 247 (Hidden Service Vanguards) Overhaul

2015-09-13 Thread Mike Perry
I spent some time trying to clean up proposal 247 based on everyone's comments, as well as based on my own thoughts. Please have a look if you commented on the original proposal, and complain if I've not taken your thoughts into account. (Aaron: In particular, I made several tradeoffs in favor of