Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

the best solution. Thanks, Yaron -Original Message- From: tor-dev [mailto:tor-dev-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Rand Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 3:30 PM To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin Yaron

Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

Hi, Yaron Goland: naming experiment extension +1 for awesome usability test!! Wordlife, Spencer ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

Yaron Goland: > I'm also a noob, so just to be clear, is the goal here to adopt namecoin as a > naming mechanism for hidden services or is the goal to enable a generic > extension mechanism where multiple different naming solutions can be > experimented with and namecoin wants to build the code

Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

George Kadianakis writes: > [ text/plain ] > Jeremy Rand writes: > >> [ text/plain ] >> Hello Tor devs, >> >> Namecoin is interested in collaboration with Tor in relation to >> human-readable .onion names; I'm reaching out to see how open the Tor >>

Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

George Kadianakis: > > Hello Jeremy, Hi George, thanks for the reply. > I'm a big noob when it comes to blockchains, namecoin, SPV clients and such, > so > I'm mainly going to focus on how to integrate this with Tor. I know this isn't necessarily needed given that this would start out as an

Re: [tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

ctl-filter? Would it be a painful UX? FWIW, I'm also not sure what's the state of Jeff Burdges' name resolution idea, whether there are any plans on moving forward, and whether it would fit the Namecoin API. ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

[tor-dev] Tor and Namecoin

Hello Tor devs, Namecoin is interested in collaboration with Tor in relation to human-readable .onion names; I'm reaching out to see how open the Tor community would be to this, and to get feedback on how exactly the integration might work. The new hidden service spec is going to substantially