On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:03:26AM +1100, teor wrote:
> >> Ok, so you trust your friend with your IP and onion address in this use
> >> case.
> >>
> >> But do you also trust the entire Tor network?
> >
> > I opened a ticket for the OnionShare single onion service use case:
> > https://trac.torpro
> On 24 Jan 2017, at 14:01, teor wrote:
>
>
>> On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:17, teor wrote:
>>
>>> For example, maybe I want to use OnionShare to send my friend a 2GB
>>> video clip, but anonymity doesn't matter to me. My friend and I already
>>> know who each other are, and I'm not concerned about
> On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:17, teor wrote:
>
>> For example, maybe I want to use OnionShare to send my friend a 2GB
>> video clip, but anonymity doesn't matter to me. My friend and I already
>> know who each other are, and I'm not concerned about leaking what we're
>> doing, I just don't want to le
> On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:17, teor wrote:
>
> Single Onion Services leak the service IP address to at least:
> * 6 HSDirs,
> ...
>
> They also link the IP and onion address at:
> * 6 HSDirs.
>
> (For next-generation hidden services, the situation is slightly better:
>
> The IP leaks are the sam
> On 4 Jan 2017, at 12:39, Micah Lee wrote:
>
> On 01/02/2017 08:45 PM, teor wrote:
>>> For my specific use-case, it would be great if you could pass an
>>> argument to ADD_ONION that makes that specific onion service
>>> non-anonymous, without changing anything globally.
>>
>> What is the Onio
On 01/02/2017 08:45 PM, teor wrote:
>> For my specific use-case, it would be great if you could pass an
>> argument to ADD_ONION that makes that specific onion service
>> non-anonymous, without changing anything globally.
>
> What is the OnionShare use case?
> What are the anonymity expectations of
> On 29 Dec 2016, at 09:31, Micah Lee wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2016 12:40 PM, Yawning Angel wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:19:17 -0800
>> Micah Lee wrote:
>>
>>> And when other processes connect to the Tor control port and run
>>> create_ephemeral_hidden_service, those onion services wouldn't be
>
On 12/28/2016 12:40 PM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:19:17 -0800
> Micah Lee wrote:
>
>> And when other processes connect to the Tor control port and run
>> create_ephemeral_hidden_service, those onion services wouldn't be
>> non-anonymous?
>
> They'll be non-anonymous (as in, t
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:19:17 -0800
Micah Lee wrote:
> And when other processes connect to the Tor control port and run
> create_ephemeral_hidden_service, those onion services wouldn't be
> non-anonymous?
They'll be non-anonymous (as in, the options are global). This also
will not work if there
> Excellent. I'm pretty sure this will work, but can you confirm? If I'd
> like to use a non-anonymous ephemeral onion service, would code that's
> something like this work, assuming c is a Controller?
>
> c.set_conf('HiddenServiceSingleHopMode', 1)
> c.set_conf('HiddenServiceNonAnonymousMode', 1)
On 12/28/2016 09:39 AM, Damian Johnson wrote:
> Oops, great catch - thanks Micah! Added a note saying how to use them...
>
> "Version 1.5: Added support for non-anonymous services. To do so set
> 'HiddenServiceSingleHopMode 1' and 'HiddenServiceNonAnonymousMode 1'
> in your torrc."
Excellent. I'm
Oops, great catch - thanks Micah! Added a note saying how to use them...
"Version 1.5: Added support for non-anonymous services. To do so set
'HiddenServiceSingleHopMode 1' and 'HiddenServiceNonAnonymousMode 1'
in your torrc."
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Micah Lee wrote:
> The stem documen
The stem documentation for create_ephemeral_hidden_service [1] says:
"Changed in version 1.5.0: Added support for non-anonymous services."
But I can't figure out to actually use this feature. There doesn't seem
to be a new argument to say if you want your onion service to be
non-anonymous.
It als
13 matches
Mail list logo
