Thus spake Mike Perry (mikepe...@torproject.org):
> Thus spake Tim Wilde (twi...@cymru.com):
>
> > > I try to keep everything I do documented on that wiki. All these
> > > servers run four instances of Tor each (one per core) and traffic
> > > is accounted for in total. Also, keep in mind that vn
Thus spake Tim Wilde (twi...@cymru.com):
> > I try to keep everything I do documented on that wiki. All these
> > servers run four instances of Tor each (one per core) and traffic
> > is accounted for in total. Also, keep in mind that vnstat counts
> > both incoming and outgoing traffic, so 700Mbp
Thus spake Jon (torance...@gmail.com):
> In adding further info on the topic, I have noticed and looked back
> over the past couple of weeks and have seen a drop of of usage of
> about 43% s of today. I am not in the higher bracket as others, but I
> have been in the 3 bars bracket only up till r
Thus spake Sebastian Urbach (sebast...@urbach.org):
> Seems to get better in the last hours ...
>
> I want to suggest strongly a change for the metrics / performance site.
> The displayed default size is 50KB and should be changed to 1MB. 50 KB
> ist out of touch with reality for any service i ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2011 3:21 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> I try to keep everything I do documented on that wiki. All these
> servers run four instances of Tor each (one per core) and traffic
> is accounted for in total. Also, keep in mind that vnstat counts
> both
On 12.12.2011 20:18, Tim Wilde wrote:
> Any specific tips on how you're pushing 700Mbps from a single instance
> (I assume that's what that's indicating) beyond what's on your wiki?
> With AES-NI and most (maybe all) of the tweaks I've found on your
> pages (awesome resource, by the way, thanks for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/10/2011 6:56 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 10.12.2011 11:30, Andy Isaacson wrote:
>>> Please keep an eye on your relays and tell us if anything
>>> unexpected happens over the next week or so.
>> we're seeing a pretty significant rise in throughpu
I'm also running a guard relay that for some months was pushing 600kBs
pretty steadily. In the last couple weeks it's lower and very variable
and today it has basically cratered.
Is this a likely results of the bandwidth algorithm testing that's going
on or might I have other problems?
Thanks,
Wa
In adding further info on the topic, I have noticed and looked back
over the past couple of weeks and have seen a drop of of usage of
about 43% s of today. I am not in the higher bracket as others, but I
have been in the 3 bars bracket only up till recently.
Don't know if this will help, but if i
Am Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:56:23 -0800
schrieb Mike Perry :
Hi Mike,
> I do not fully understand the cause of it yet, but I did find a rather
> nasty bug in the treatment of Guard nodes, where we were not properly
> using the "bwauthmercy" consensus param for them, and were punishing
> slow guards thr
10 matches
Mail list logo
