Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread mick
On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:17:20 -0700 Mike Perry allegedly wrote: > > As of yet, no one has mentioned the port. Out of curiosity, is it > included in the Reduced Exit Policy? > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy Mike The port number reported was 80. My exit policy

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread mick
On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:21:46 -0500 Jon allegedly wrote: > > > The port was 57734 - of course that doesn't mean another port could > be used That looks like a source port to me. In my case, the (allegedly) attacked ports were 80, so clearly webservers. Mick

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread Moritz Bartl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We also get (and ignore) these automated reports. Try to convince your ISP to reassign the IP range and list you as abuse contact. If that does not work, you can simply block celepar's ranges: - From scanning 129 recent mails: Destination: 200.1

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread Moritz Bartl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We also get (and ignore) these automated reports. Try to convince your ISP to reassign the IP range and list you as abuse contact. If that does not work, you can simply block celepar's ranges. Scan

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread Moritz Bartl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We also get (and ignore) these automated reports. Try to convince your ISP to reassign the IP range and list you as abuse contact. If that does not work, you can simply block celepar's ranges. Scanning 129 recent mails: Destination: 200.189.113.

Re: [tor-relays] case law on for exit nodes

2012-05-23 Thread andrew
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:44:48AM +0200, r...@zenger.nl wrote 2.4K bytes in 67 lines about: : Thanks! Someone sent me a few links to one or more cases in Germany, related to wikileaks.de. If you come across more, please let me know. To be clear, wikileaks.de and tor are completely separate case

Re: [tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread Jon
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > Thus spake Jon (torance...@gmail.com): > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mike Perry >wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:29:54 -0500 > > > > Jon allegedly wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yep same here, got notice today from ISP on a repor

[tor-relays] too many abuse reports

2012-05-23 Thread xorox
Timestamp: 2012-05-09 15:43:12 (GMT) Alert: COSED [CSG-GOP-009] SCAN Sqlmap SQL Injection Scan Source: 78.46.66.112 (43741) Destination: 200.189.113.50 (80) Timestamp: 2012-05-15 09:08:23 (GMT) Alert: COSED [CSG-GOP-009] SCAN Sqlmap SQL Injection Scan Source: 78.46.66.112 (56067) Destination: 200.

Re: [tor-relays] case law on for exit nodes

2012-05-23 Thread Martin Fick
--- On Wed, 5/23/12, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > It means that even if you are innocent, for each penal issue > it happen to you, you have to stay in the justice loop for many > years. Not being charged is often worse than being charged. Being charged and going to court can lead to closur