Re: [tor-relays] A call to arms for obfuscated bridges

2013-04-19 Thread Lunar
Andreas Krey: On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:50:48 +, Lunar wrote: Drake Wilson: - bypass declared installation requirements, use 2.6.6, and blindly hope that it won't result in some awful subtle bug; obfsproxy works on Debian Squeeze which bears 2.6.6. I had to patch the Mind

Re: [tor-relays] What is regular traffic on an obfuscated bridge

2013-04-19 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 19.04.2013 21:34, Torry Torah wrote: Hi there, After seeing the call to arm [1], I decided to spin up some 2 new obfuscated bridges. I am already running 2 (non-obf) bridges, and was about to boot 3 others. I'm seeing something like 4MB/day of traffic with those obf bridges,

Re: [tor-relays] What is regular traffic on an obfuscated bridge

2013-04-19 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 20.04.2013 00:00, Torry Torah wrote: Okay thanks. By the way, does it make sense to have an obfuscated bridge be an exit node? It is of any interest? It looks like you can currently be either bridge, or regular relay/exit. https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1776 -- Moritz

Re: [tor-relays] What is regular traffic on an obfuscated bridge

2013-04-19 Thread Aaron
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Moritz Bartl mor...@torservers.netwrote: On 20.04.2013 00:00, Torry Torah wrote: Okay thanks. By the way, does it make sense to have an obfuscated bridge be an exit node? It is of any interest? It looks like you can currently be either bridge, or regular