Yeah. Not saying I see a good way to do it. Not really asking for it.
Whiny, IDS-noticed, almost nuisance-type complaints are the only ones
we've gotten. The complaints aren't even describing successful
intrusions. Sucks if these whinebucket type of complaints are making
it harder in real worl
On 29 October 2013 22:53, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> Yes, to some extent. I edited the config, as I was willing to pay for the
> extra bandwidth, and enabled an Exit Relay.
>
> I was under the impression that this was permitted.
Amazon does not like Exit Nodes running in EC2. I'm not sure if there
Hi,
Sounds like you risk ending up with a censorship tool controlled by
those who control the list of attack signatures.
I'd prefer if we educate service providers about this dangerous place
called the internet with the goal of making them turn down the volume on
their sirens a notch.
t...@t-3.
What he said.
No DMCA so far but, one thing I keep getting is complaints about "SQL
injection attacks". Apparently snort or other IDS picks this stuff up
and emails the abuse box. Some but not all of the complaints are
automated.
It would be nice if something could detect these attack signat
On 25.10.2013 19:13, krishna e bera wrote:
>> ExitPolicy accept *:1723 # PPTP
> How are you getting PPTP to work over Tor? The ISP-supplied modems i've
> seen won't pass IP protocol 47 (GRE) packets without putting the target
> machine in a DMZ.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/
