Re: [tor-relays] Bad idea to switch from a relay to a bridge?

On Nov 14, 2013, at 15:01 , Nick wrote: > Hi, > > <...> > > However, I'm wondering whether the fact that my IP is already known > as a relay means that it wouldn't be useful? > <...> > Thanks for any advice, > > Nick This may not work or be an option for you/everyone, but if I change the MAC

Re: [tor-relays] Setting UP an Tor exit node with resrictions

I heartily agree > > I'd say if you want to run an exit node you shouldn't try to hide. You > should own a public IP and run it under your name and state that it is > an exit node at as many levels as possible (whois, website on some ports > (there is a template somewhere). > > In my opinion thi

Re: [tor-relays] Huge harrassment by Irdeto and IP-Echelon, 83 mails, in 2 weeks, need your help

I would prefer to receive a lot of such abuse complaints, forwarded unfiltered, than to let the ISP cut off the relay. At least that way they are passing on the responsibility closer to the source of the problem (that they know of), rather than making decisions over which the relay operator has no

Re: [tor-relays] Ingoing & Outgoing connections

On 14.11.2013 20:21, earlgrey wrote: > Hello, > > is it possible to achieve this behaviour : > > RELAYRELAY RELAY RELAYRELAYRELAY > | | || || >++++++ > | > | > ( internet co

[tor-relays] Ingoing & Outgoing connections

Hello, is it possible to achieve this behaviour : RELAYRELAY RELAY RELAYRELAYRELAY | | || || ++++++ | | ( internet connection 1 ) | | MY REL

Re: [tor-relays] Huge harrassment by Irdeto and IP-Echelon, 83 mails, in 2 weeks, need your help

Hi Dan and Moritz, Thank you very much for your answers. So my case is not the only one with this kind of automatized abuses complaints, it's really important for me to know this. Dan your idea is very interesting because it matches with Moritz's idea and as you say, there is absolutely no leg

Re: [tor-relays] Bad idea to switch from a relay to a bridge?

Just to illustrate further, it's really easy to see if an IPv4 address was *ever* part of the network, e.g. look up current moria1's address: http://ts.mkj.lt:/details?search=128.31.0.34 So if a bridge was a relay once (under the same ip addr), implementing an additional check in GFW or wherev

Re: [tor-relays] Bad idea to switch from a relay to a bridge?

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Nick wrote: > Hi, > > I've been running a very low bandwidth relay for a little while with > my home ADSL connection, but given the up speed is so poor, and > (more importantly) my ADSL provider has stopped switching my IP > about every 24 hours, I'd like to switc

[tor-relays] Bad idea to switch from a relay to a bridge?

Hi, I've been running a very low bandwidth relay for a little while with my home ADSL connection, but given the up speed is so poor, and (more importantly) my ADSL provider has stopped switching my IP about every 24 hours, I'd like to switch to be a bridge. However, I'm wondering whether the f

Re: [tor-relays] Setting UP an Tor exit node with resrictions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14.11.2013 13:21, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Anonymous: >> 11.11.2013 20:55, Anonymous kirjoitti: >>> 11.11.2013 20:08, krishna e bera kirjoitti: On 13-11-11 12:56 PM, Anonymous wrote: > How may I create an Tor exit node with some ports and

Re: [tor-relays] Setting UP an Tor exit node with resrictions

Anonymous: > 11.11.2013 20:55, Anonymous kirjoitti: >> 11.11.2013 20:08, krishna e bera kirjoitti: >>> On 13-11-11 12:56 PM, Anonymous wrote: How may I create an Tor exit node with some ports and sites blacklisted? > >>> See the Reduced Exit Policy page referred to at >>> https://blog.