Hi guys,
i updated from Tor 0.2.3.25 (relay 266C0CADC79F802C554019887324A57332A1DA70) to
Tor 0.2.4.21 yesterday and the relay fingerprint changed to
07E333A3B979C27739096C5B2EE10D7C8E3D8FFD.
Is there any way to get the new version working with the old fingerprint?
I looked in the manual and tri
Is it possible that either the "DataDirectory" setting changed due to
the update or the directory content?
Best regards,
Alexander
---
PGP Key: 0xC55A356B | https://dietrich.cx/pgp
On 2014-03-22 15:26, Oliver Schönefeld wrote:
Hi guys,
i updated from Tor 0.2.3.25 (relay
266C0CADC79F802C554019
...and the t-shirt counter at Atlas.torproject.org resets
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 03:26:07PM +0100, Oliver Schönefeld wrote:
> i updated from Tor 0.2.3.25 (relay 266C0CADC79F802C554019887324A57332A1DA70)
> to Tor 0.2.4.21 yesterday and the relay fingerprint changed to
> 07E333A3B979C27739096C5B2EE10D7C8E3D8FFD.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#Upgra
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Lance Hathaway wrote:
> If you're going to be running these as bridges, it seems to make sense
> to include obfsproxy support, probably with obfs3 and scramblesuit [0]
> enabled right off the bat.
Thanks for the information. Is it likely that obfs3 and scramblesui
James Valleroy:
> The reason that I'm asking is that FreedomBox is currently working
> within Debian "testing" but our target is Debian "stable". Once our
> packaged configuration is frozen for the next stable release, it will
> be more difficult for us to push changes other than security fixes.
(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 22/03/2014 11:56 AM, James Valleroy wrote:
> Thanks for the information. Is it likely that obfs3 and
> scramblesuit will be usable in the long-term? Or will they need to
> be deprecated at some point like obfs2?
>
> Also, if obfs3 or scramblesuit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi list,
I'm running tor-relay (middle) on VPS from statnet.pl (reseller form
Hetzner)
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/C528972A915EEADE37F5B11A7AB7B571C89F46E7
Now i'm in top 50 of all relays for only 8,3 euro/month i think it's a
good deal
Question how long you'll stay in the Top 50. Maybe you are lucky but
probably the ISP will end your contract for "abusing" fair use
policies/TOS. Best case they'll throttle you down. Let us know in 30 days :)
Am 22.03.14 21:51, schrieb Trigger Happy:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running tor-relay (middle) o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello all,
I've finally released[1] signed binary .debs for Tor 0.2.4.21 for
Raspberry Pi. All the usual "random dude's binaries" apply, but at
least these are signed with my PGP key and distributed with hashes.
They're really for temporary Pi test
Thanks for this Gordon M - just thought I'd add that if it's useful for
anyone, I threw a Pi Tor (middle) relay setup guide together a while ago -
you can see it here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bf_D_j1O-9ckTS9DY8ngIdiFwHta6Q5Uj_5dvOiavCQ/edit?usp=sharing
If I've omitted anything importa
Gordon,
Have you evaluated the Riotboard(.org) for your idea of plug in Tor relay?
It looks like it uses about the same amount of energy as the Cubieboard but for
a little more money would be a lot more capable.
Robert
___
tor-relays mailing list
t
Potential throttling notwithstanding, that you are willing to help out a
great cause earns you the stars in your crown... but you'll still need
to wait for your T-shirt.
P
--
Dirt kicked to the curb goes into the gutter.
Professionals kicked to the curb go into retail.
Rick Ross wrote:
Ques
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:33:01PM +0100, Rick Ross wrote:
> Question how long you'll stay in the Top 50. Maybe you are lucky but
> probably the ISP will end your contract for "abusing" fair use
> policies/TOS. Best case they'll throttle you down. Let us know in 30 days :)
Or maybe more than 30 da
14 matches
Mail list logo
