On 12/09/14 15:02, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Hello,
I've setup a non-exit node so that I can contribute and understand the
TOR network somewhat better. I've only had my node (jolexarelay1) up
for a few weeks so it is still becoming a part of the network at guard
status. So, as I understand my ISP, I
Hello,
I've setup a non-exit node so that I can contribute and understand the
TOR network somewhat better. I've only had my node (jolexarelay1) up
for a few weeks so it is still becoming a part of the network at guard
status. So, as I understand my ISP, I can run an exit node if I
"handle" abuse c
Perhaps it is worth a discrete try with a reduced exit policy.
I have several VPS exits running against stated bans.
The superficial legal statements apparently are not the entire story.
Robert
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.or
On 11/09/14 07:07, Toralf Förster wrote:
3 things:
1.
=
This is what I get few days ago from Hetzer Support:
Guten Tag Herr Förster,
laut Deutschem Recht sind Tor Server im Moment nicht verboten.
Aus diesem Grund sind Tor Server bei uns auch nicht verboten.
Aus Erfahrung raten wir je
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think nobody ever mentioned 1und1.de as a dedicated root server hoster.
I looked around a bit but couldn't find any hints about anonymisation
services or Tor specifically in the FAQs or TOS.
Just wrote an email to the support and asked about that. I'
On 11 Sep 2014, at 21:20, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> Did you already look at Server4You?
> oops, not now, wiki discouraged me at the first glance - will check
I have the worst possible expierences with that company and hosting
servers there. Would not recommend it at all. This includes:
- fake v
On 09/11/2014 08:21 PM, DerTorSteher wrote:
> euServ used to be a good provider I think. But to legally host a Tor relay
> you have to rent a dedicated root server there.
Was one of my candidates (due to Gentoo-supported OS), but :
http://faq.euserv.de/content/1/149/en/is-tor-irc-or-another-proxy-s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Toralf,
euServ used to be a good provider I think. But to legally host a Tor relay
you have to rent a dedicated root server there.
Did you already look at Server4You?
I think they are a little expensive compared to other hosters but the
quality is s
On 09/10/2014 11:05 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Overall, I would strongly suggest a different provider, but there is no
> groud truth on how much bandwidth any ISP (or country) should see.
Looked around for another provider in Germany with good prices and an
appropriate AGB (added few things to the
Hi,
What is the current state of IPv6?
==cut==
Relays to relays
Relays talk to other relays. The work with relays talking to other relays over
IPv6 has not been started.
==cut==
Is there any plans to start? How I can help?
==cut==
Directory authorities on IPv6
Clients and relays talk to dire
Dear Dan,
Sorry to hear you're having trouble. As I guess you read in previous
messages on here - I had a similar issue with nhs.gov.uk and the BBC
earlier this year. At this point, I again have access to both sites. for
the BBC, you could try filling in this form if you haven't already:
http://i
All
I can see there was a previous thread related to this in June, but thought
I'd add what I'm seeing to the discussion.
After the *Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill (DRIP) *was rushed
through parliament I decided to do my bit for the privacy cause and run a
couple of Tor relays.
I r
12 matches
Mail list logo