Re: [tor-relays] scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread Jan Nielsen
Ok, I got scramblesuit working. Had to change various permissions and copy over the new obfsproxy Dir from /usr/local/bin to /usr/bin/. The log file helped; thank you! And just to confirm, I did receive a " server transport registered scramblesuit" entry in my log. On Oct 1, 2014 7:00 PM, wrote:

Re: [tor-relays] Nokia n900 relay

2014-10-01 Thread I
Could it be fast enough to be valuable?  -Original Message-From: franklincha...@gmail.comSent: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 09:32:13 +0800To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: [tor-relays] Nokia n900 relayHiHow to setup relay address on nokia n900?

[tor-relays] Nokia n900 relay

2014-10-01 Thread Franklin
Hi How to setup relay address on nokia n900? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread Jan Nielsen
When I restart tor with that option enabled I get: " 2014-10-02 00:52:38,199 [WARNING] Obfsproxy (version: 0.2.3) starting up. 2014-10-02 00:52:38,199 [INFO] Entering server managed-mode. 2014-10-02 00:52:38,200 [INFO] No transports launched. Nothing to do." I noticed it says version 0.2.3 starti

Re: [tor-relays] Scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread Chris Whittleston
Thanks, will look at that link - sounds interesting indeed! Maybe something to play with in the future. On 2 Oct 2014 01:24, "isis" wrote: > Chris Whittleston transcribed 5.0K bytes: > > I'm right in thinking that running scramblesuit is not going to do > anything > > for a middle relay correct?

Re: [tor-relays] Scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread isis
Chris Whittleston transcribed 5.0K bytes: > I'm right in thinking that running scramblesuit is not going to do anything > for a middle relay correct? Correct. Pluggable Transports are (normally) used for hiding that one is speaking the Tor protocol (also they could be used to disguise any protoco

Re: [tor-relays] Scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread Chris Whittleston
I'm right in thinking that running scramblesuit is not going to do anything for a middle relay correct? On 2 October 2014 00:41, isis wrote: > Jan Nielsen transcribed 2.2K bytes: > > Hi. > > > > I am trying to enable Scramblesuit for my bridge. I am wondering if there > > is a method to verify t

Re: [tor-relays] Failed to load Scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread isis
Christian transcribed 1.5K bytes: > I thought it was a permissions problem somehow as > --log-min-severity=debug --log-file=/home/me/obfs.log won't even create > the logfile so that obfsproxy fails from the very beginning. Try that again with `--log-min-severity debug --log-file /home/me/obfs.log`

Re: [tor-relays] Scramblesuit

2014-10-01 Thread isis
Jan Nielsen transcribed 2.2K bytes: > Hi. > > I am trying to enable Scramblesuit for my bridge. I am wondering if there > is a method to verify that it is working, similar to how obfs3 shows > "registered server transport". There is not much out there about > scramblesuit but there is one mention

Re: [tor-relays] Bandwidth not being used by Tor on Gigabit dedicated server

2014-10-01 Thread Jon Daniels
Thank you for the reply. I have already (months ago) configured the max file limit to be 795552. Perhaps I'll try running more instances... On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote: > I've often found my servers accidentally bottlenecked by the default open > file limit on so

[tor-relays] tor-relays mailing list submissions

2014-10-01 Thread top mail
tor-relays mailing list submissions ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] tor-relays

2014-10-01 Thread top mail
tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays