> I would expect most US universities to be logging netflow in the very
> least. Even if the Tor operator isn't keeping logs, it seems safe to assume
> the network operator is.
I'd be surprised if it was different for non-US universities - I'd
expect this to be the case for every university with i
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:41 AM, wrote:
>
> I ran some tests against your node. While performance is generally very
> good, it has very low performance connecting to some exit nodes.
Thanks for running the tests. Which exit nodes led to poor performance? I
would like to try to reproduce any perf
>> If you can confirm that the comment is authentic I'd be interested
>> what kind of tor related data you are logging at your exit relays and
why.
> It's most likely netflow logs. Quite popular in Uni / regional ISP
> environments. People collect them for network stats, and to track
> down "secur
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Damian Busby wrote:
> Personally, if I had been the person in comment #2, I would have sent all
> those logs anyway.
Mind telling us what relays you're operating so
we can block them in our clients?
> Then they would have been compelled to review them.
That's up
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:03 AM, nusenu wrote:
> that implies that USU exit relays store significant amount of logs
>
>> node. I said that we had extracted and filtered the requested data,
>> it was 90 4 gig files (for a total of 360 gigs of log files) or
>> about 3.2 billion log entries.
>
> If yo
Original Message
From: starlight.201...@binnacle.cx
Apparently from: tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-relays] Guard flag flapping
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 14:39:48 -0400
> My advice is that this QWest service is third-rate
>
[apologies to all for thread-breaking, am
really going on hiatus but the horror-show
performance GBE topic was too darn
interesting--last post I promise!]
>I would call it a dedicated gigabit link. This is
>probably up for debate. The provider's overall
>capacity is very likely not [number of
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 11:23:52 -0400
starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> Hi nusenu,
>
> Normally I respond to list messages
> and threading works, but lately
> I've turned off list delivery
> in an effort to pay less attention
> to the tor-relays list. Sorry about
> the resultant messy thread co
>The problem is likely that your ISP is routing
>some traffic via an overloaded peering point.
Running
traceroute -w 1 -q 5 -A 1400
may provide more detail on this issue.
The -A option causes 'traceroute' to show
Autonomous System numbers with each
route hop, where ASNs are Internet
routing
>. . .have physical access to the . . . ONT.
>
Doubt this is the case, but on the off chance that
the ONT is configured to flow IP traffic over a
coaxial cable attached to a CPE router (customer
premise equipment), the configuration should be
changed to deliver data over a Gigabit Ethernet
directl
Hi nusenu,
Normally I respond to list messages
and threading works, but lately
I've turned off list delivery
in an effort to pay less attention
to the tor-relays list. Sorry about
the resultant messy thread continuity.
With luck I'll be posting less, and
if I come back in a few weeks or months
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> it'll need to catch up on the data.
Thanks for the info.
There might be a problem with the data as well:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-August/009227.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVxgm5AAoJEFv7XvVCELh0gZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten just gave the thing a boot. The classic "Have you turned it
off then on again?" scenario because you know, we're all cybering.
Give it a few hours and we'll check on it again as I imagine it'll
need to catch up on the data.
T
On 08/08/2015 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
hi starlight,
is there any chance we can talk you into setting the usual email
headers for proper email threading?
(decent MUAs take care of this by default)
At times it is hard to follow the flow of a discussion if every email
starts a new thread
Original Message
From: Green Dream
Apparently from: tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag flapping
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 21:49:16 -0700
> I've learned from this thread that the Guard flag flapping is a d
15 matches
Mail list logo
