> They're also likely to be wiretapping magnets.
That's an interesting point. Can we go deeper into this?
Does this mean that, everything else being equal, the good locations for
Tor nodes also happen to be the good locations for surveillance tapping
points?
If yes, my first thought was that ma
I think good places for nodes means places where there aren't many now.Rob
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> good locations...
> intelligence prioritizes spying on Tor relays they will simply download the
> list and tap the desired relays, regardless of where the relay is
> topographically located.
There may be situations in which tapping at a p
