Sebastian Hahn:
> Hi,
>
> > On 16 Sep 2015, at 05:22, nobody wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am looking at renting a dedicated server on a unmetered 100 Mbit/s
> > connection, but the CPU is a Intel G850, which is old (Q2 2011) and does
> > not have AES-NI. Will this CPU be too slow to make use of
Hi,
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 05:22, nobody wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking at renting a dedicated server on a unmetered 100 Mbit/s
> connection, but the CPU is a Intel G850, which is old (Q2 2011) and does
> not have AES-NI. Will this CPU be too slow to make use of the bandwidth?
I'm currently ru
Hi all,
I am looking at renting a dedicated server on a unmetered 100 Mbit/s
connection, but the CPU is a Intel G850, which is old (Q2 2011) and does
not have AES-NI. Will this CPU be too slow to make use of the bandwidth?
Thanks,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
On 16/09/15 07:42, spiros_spi...@freemail.gr wrote:
Greetings community,
Over last eight weeks a Tor exit that I operate has attracted more
and
more abuse reports and the VPS data centre is starting to lose their
patience with the amount of tickets they open for each incident.
Almost all
On 16/09/15 08:36, but...@gmx.de wrote:
Hey,
I also had a lot of problems with my ISP concerning abuse reports.
They shutted down my exit relays several times. I got a last chance,
before they notice the contract.
So I decided to go a controversial way - I installed an IDS/IPS + strong
firewall r
Hey,
I also had a lot of problems with my ISP concerning abuse reports.
They shutted down my exit relays several times. I got a last chance, before they notice the contract.
So I decided to go a controversial way - I installed an IDS/IPS + strong firewall rules.
The log file contains a h
Hallo Spiros,
in my opinion there is no real solution to it then blocking the ips in
your exit policy, but that won't help these server operators, because
the "hacker" will just exit via another exit node.
I guess there is no solution to this, just ask your hosting company to
forward the abuse ema
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 05:42, spiros_spi...@freemail.gr wrote:
>
>
> Greetings community,
>
> Over last eight weeks a Tor exit that I operate has attracted more and more
> abuse reports and the VPS data centre is starting to lose their patience with
> the amount of tickets they open for each in
Greetings community,
Over last eight weeks a Tor exit that I operate has attracted more and more
abuse reports and the VPS data centre is starting to lose their patience with
the amount of tickets they open for each incident.
Almost all of the abuse reports are relate to attempts to access w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've checked the Atlas page - you ave ~235.82KB/s.
However, you may not get AS MUCH traffic in the beginning, because you
are a non-exit relay, and you have to wait for your Tor Relay to be
added to the network. Publish the directory aswell if you ca
As starlight said, you are getting the appropriate amount of traffic according
to the bandwidth authority measurements for your relay.
Right now, the middle/entry nodes are relatively lightly utilized. This is a
good thing, since it makes for a much better user experience. With high
utilization
11 matches
Mail list logo
