On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:11:23 -0400
starlight.201...@binnacle.cx allegedly wrote:
> Choices are not simple.
>
Never have been. And they get tougher over time. Trust me.
-
Mick Morgan
gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 20:20:13 -, nusenu wrote:
>>> LeaseWeb has 49 euro 100TB servers available
>>> in the Netherlands--killer exit boxes that will
>>> rate high and pull 15000 per Blutmagie. OVH has
>>> good offerings as well
>>
>>Please consider diversity when adding relays.
>>
>>OVH (AS
What does NL (CC)?
>
> OVH (AS) and NL (CC) are among the worst places to add relays from a
> (simplified) diversity point of view.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-
> LeaseWeb has 49 euro 100TB servers available
> in the Netherlands--killer exit boxes that will
> rate high and pull 15000 per Blutmagie. OVH has
> good offerings as well
Please consider diversity when adding relays.
OVH (AS) and NL (CC) are among the worst places to add relays from a
(simplifi
>>I turned up 4 instances, waited a few days to see which one performed the best, then shut down the others.That is very clever.Some perform much better than others.Rob,
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.
Due to the variance of performance of VPS instances, the last time I
decided to add another single relay, I turned up 4 instances, waited a few
days to see which one performed the best, then shut down the others. This
only cost a few extra USD, at most, and greatly improved the value of the
remaini
> Normally I respond to list messages
> and threading works, but lately
> I've turned off list delivery
> in an effort to pay less attention
> to the tor-relays list. Sorry about
> the resultant messy thread continuity.
>
> With luck I'll be posting less, and
> if I come back in a few weeks or mo
_gfs_ ccrelaycc NL 942 98 4.27 L 95.85.8.226 443 80 95.85.8.226
__fs_ jaine IT 216 13 4.27 L 5.249.145.164 443 80 ... .aruba.it
__fs_ inara SG 38 98 4.27 L 128.199.148.243 443 80 128.199.148.243
One likely contributor to the relatively
high rating of 'ccrelaycc' is residence
in t
>None of the above :)
>
>I run these three relays[1][2][3].
>
>ccrelaycc [1] has acquired the guard flag in the
>last few days (don't know when, last time I
>checked it did not have it).
This relay is rated near the boundary of
minimum Guard rating and goes in and out
of the state.
>A thing that
2015-10-14 23:35 GMT+02:00 :
>>* given costant resource (i.e. euro/month) I can
>>afford to run relays is it in general better to
>>run one bigger relay or, say, two smaller ones.
>
> Based on a past thread, guessing you run
>
> __fs_ BV2 IT 344 71 6.10 L 5.249.159.209 9001 None ... .aruba.it
> __
2015-10-14 23:46 GMT+02:00 Saint Aardvark the Carpeted
:
> An alternative to Puppet or Chef (and I'm a fan of both) would be
> Ansible; it's much simpler to pick up, and uses SSH to connect to
> machines to manage them -- no master server needed. I'd say that
> with three nodes, something like thi
On 10/15/2015 01:22 AM, Green Dream wrote:
>> An alternative to Puppet or Chef (and I'm a fan of both) would be
>> Ansible; it's much simpler to pick up, and uses SSH to connect to
>> machines to manage them -- no master server needed.
> You just changed my life. I just hadn't looked into Ansible y
12 matches
Mail list logo
