This will be my lengthy opinion on Webiron to get everything out of my
mind without redactions.
> Webiron's system sends notifications to both the abusix.org contact
> for the IP and to abuse at base-domain.tld for the reverse-DNS name of
> the relay IP.
This doesn't seem to be the case for us. O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/2/2015 7:09 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> Kurt Besig wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 12/2/2015 3:06 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
>>> Kurt Besig wrote:
I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quit
Kurt Besig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/2/2015 3:06 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> > Kurt Besig wrote:
> >> I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quite a few
> >> running relays had mostly good things to say about the service.
> >> So Far the peopl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/2/2015 3:06 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
> Kurt Besig wrote:
>> I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quite a few
>> running relays had mostly good things to say about the service.
>> So Far the people operating the servers seem very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/2/2015 4:54 PM, I wrote:
> Doesn't Arm look for 9051?
>
> Robert
>
>
> ___ tor-relays mailing
> list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relay
Doesn't Arm look for 9051?
Robert
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Kurt Besig wrote:
> I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quite a few running
> relays had mostly good things to say about the service. So Far the
> people operating the servers seem very cooperative and responsive.
> Anyway I've been running a middle relay for 1.5 years and know the
> "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just set up a VPS on PulseServers as I noticed quite a few running
relays had mostly good things to say about the service. So Far the
people operating the servers seem very cooperative and responsive.
Anyway I've been running a middle relay for 1.5 y
Hi spriver,
This happened before. Webtropia hates Tor. They even shut us down even
though we only planned to host a non-exit relay there. Planned to. We
paid the setup and the first month, but they just cancelled our
contract. We tried explaining, then I think Juris even talked to the
CEO, and fin
Hi,
I got some more information from my provider:
http://www.stopforumspam.com/ipcheck/62.141.45.246
The spam is indeed spamming with accounts in some message boards. (which
is also forbidden in the ToU of my provider)
spriver:
> Hi,
>
> I am (or was) running a Tor Exit Node with about 200-250bmi
Hi,
I am (or was) running a Tor Exit Node with about 200-250bmit/s on a VPS
at Webtropia for several months with the common reduced exit policy
(https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/D218DF2C542CD1FB57FCF36DB6672A0DE6A8CBF1).
They never had a problem with the fact of running an exit, from time to
t
11 matches
Mail list logo
