Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

On 4/7/16, Roger Dingledine wrote: > Your above confusion is why nobody should ever write "b" or "B" in this > day and age. Re confusion... as said before with reference links to official standards... These days, formally... "b" bit and "B" byte are well defined context. "k" is

Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police

Even if he is formating all the things: You can't be sure that any middle/exit/guard node is compromised. How do you know I am one of the good guys with my nodes? You can't. I could role play here and in reality be a member of the super secret society of the supreme awesome bunnies to take over

Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police

@ Tristan re: "What happened to "innocent until proven guilty?" Please note I already said "This particular case is perhaps not so clear cut" @ Markus re: "How do you know a exit server is compromised?" You don't always know. With any skill on the attacker's part, you will NOT know. Still,

Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police

The server on question was in this guy's house. He should be able to find something if it was compromised, and if not, he can easily backup his relay and wipe his hard drive. On Apr 7, 2016 6:48 PM, "Markus Koch" wrote: > The issue is: How do you know a exit server is

Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police

The issue is: How do you know a exit server is compromised? As a CCNP I can configure a SPAN Port in 30 seconds and suck all the exit traffic out of it without any indication for the server owner. Even if he visit his server in the data center and no one visit their servers :/ 2016-04-08 1:42

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

As a CCNP R and Security: STOP using bytes in networking. Networking is measured in bits for fluffys sake. 2016-04-07 20:32 GMT+02:00 SuperSluether : > My mistake, 2Mbits does mean 250 KBytes. I get confused when converting > bits/bytes. Sorry for that confusion.

Re: [tor-relays] No Daily Digest Anymore

> On 8 Apr 2016, at 05:01, stea...@nym.mixmin.net wrote: > > Signed PGP part > About 2 weeks ago I stopped getting a daily digest of this list. Is > there a reason for this? Did you stop getting all emails from the list, or did it switch to individual emails? If it stopped, did emails sent to

[tor-relays] No Daily Digest Anymore

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 About 2 weeks ago I stopped getting a daily digest of this list. Is there a reason for this? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXBonvAAoJEH1gNwhiMDZu3iIQAJDQ8D+bZ3YG9He4rpQku+Le

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

In my opinion, Tor should update the "fast" flag as well. 100KBytes/s isn't very fast by today's standards. On 04/07/2016 01:39 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:21:55PM +0200, Michael Armbruster wrote: To be a relay, your bandwidth has to be at least 250KB/s. [2] [2]

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

Am 07.04.16 um 20:21 schrieb Michael Armbruster: >> While I don't have any actual numbers, I'm pretty sure you won't be >> getting a guard flag with that kind of speed. Actually, I don't think >> you'll get much traffic at all with that slow of a relay, especially >> since the recommended upload

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:15:45PM -0500, SuperSluether wrote: > especially since the recommended upload speed is 2Mbps > (1600kBytes/s). On https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian.html I wrote "at least 250 kilobytes/s each way". So that's 2 megabits per second. Your above confusion is

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

> While I don't have any actual numbers, I'm pretty sure you won't be > getting a guard flag with that kind of speed. Actually, I don't think > you'll get much traffic at all with that slow of a relay, especially > since the recommended upload speed is 2Mbps (1600kBytes/s). No, 2Mbps are 250KBps,

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

While I don't have any actual numbers, I'm pretty sure you won't be getting a guard flag with that kind of speed. Actually, I don't think you'll get much traffic at all with that slow of a relay, especially since the recommended upload speed is 2Mbps (1600kBytes/s). At any rate, you'll still

Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag?

On 07/04/2016 17:37, Tristan wrote: > What's your connection speed? I've been running a relay for almost a > month, but I highly doubt I'll get the guard flag because I can barely > push 1Mbps. I advertise 500kBytes/s with a "burst" at 750kB/s (my max upload limit). Best, Clèm signature.asc

[tor-relays] Guard flag?

Hello, I run a relay for almost 10 days. I wonder if my configuration is correct as I don't see the expected behavior from https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay Indeed, my consensus weight and the number of connections dropped after 8 days, from 0.0040% to 0.0012% and from

Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police

krishna e bera wrote on 07/04/2016 04:28: > On 04/06/2016 04:29 AM, Marco Predicatori wrote: >> krishna e bera wrote on 05/04/2016 23:27: >>> On 04/05/2016 02:38 PM, grarpamp wrote: