> On 2 May 2016, at 09:51, eliaz wrote:
>
>> On 5/1/2016 4:52:12 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor (teor2...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 1 May 2016, at 16:52, eliaz wrote:
>>> =20
>>> =20
On 4/30/2016 7:33:26 PM, Moritz Bartl (mor...@torservers.net) wrote:
> On 04/30/2016 04:51 PM, eliaz wrote
Perhaps you could answer that with clear steps to put a restricted port list
which blocks the known offenders and web page explaining that it is only a
proxy and complaints should be directed at you?
One VPS business accepted those from me and offered to help as well.
Others did as you found and
> On 5/1/2016 4:52:12 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor (teor2...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On 1 May 2016, at 16:52, eliaz wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> >> On 4/30/2016 7:33:26 PM, Moritz Bartl (mor...@torservers.net) wrote:
> >>> On 04/30/2016 04:51 PM, eliaz wrote:
> >>> I'm having crashes when restarting tor.
The ISP holding my VPS kindly forwards the abuse complaints for me to answer.
The ISP needs to know that I have done so, and “have taken steps”. I think
the ISP pretends not to know this is from a TOR exit node.
After I connected outgoing TOR to another proxy service (VPN normally but
curr
Like it says in the exit relay guide, some ISPs find it easier to give you
the boot rather than deal with constant abuse complaints.
On May 1, 2016 12:13 PM, "Markus Koch" wrote:
This isp was exit friendly 2 weeks ago. It was posted around 3 weeks ago
(look at up) in (this mailing list) and they
This isp was exit friendly 2 weeks ago. It was posted around 3 weeks ago (look
at up) in (this mailing list) and they were fine with it. Now they are not,
just letting you guys know that they changed their minds.
Sent from my iPad
> On 01 May 2016, at 19:02, Xza wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Did you ask them what they say about Tor exit nodes?
It's common that they don't want Exit nodes on their VPS services.
Should always ask ISPs beforehand and how they deal with abuse complains.
On May 1, 2016 6:12:29 PM GMT+02:00, Markus Koch
wro
its fair to say they are fed up and dont want to have any Tor Exit
Nodes anymore. Just revieved:
Subject: Lots of abuse reports (ID 234162)
Hi,
We receive abuse reports regarding your VDS from our colleagues.
At least:
1) Registrations an
On 2016-05-01 11:35, Toralf Förster wrote:
On 05/01/2016 01:20 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Maybe it is simply too crazy for many jurisdictions to believe,
but police in Germany in most cases actually treats you well and is
not your enemy. There's no point in turning every occasion into a
combat just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/01/2016 01:20 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Maybe it is simply too crazy for many jurisdictions to believe,
> but police in Germany in most cases actually treats you well and is
> not your enemy. There's no point in turning every occasion into a
>
> On 1 May 2016, at 16:52, eliaz wrote:
>
>
>> On 4/30/2016 7:33:26 PM, Moritz Bartl (mor...@torservers.net) wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2016 04:51 PM, eliaz wrote:
>>> I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor
>>> unexpectedly exited Send a copy of Your Tor Log to the su
Ok thx for this explanation!
So if this server will be the n°1 on the onion network for the client,
it will be a the first bottleneck because of the slow upload
bandwidth... (~1Mbits/s).
I was thinking the bridge was used as a temporary door to communicate
with the Tor network, then the client will
Thanks for the precise help, Roger. some relies interleaved:
> On 4/30/2016 7:41:48 PM, Roger Dingledine (a...@mit.edu) wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 02:51:27PM +, eliaz wrote:
> > I'm having crashes when restarting tor. I get the error message "Tor
> > unexpectedly exited Send a copy
13 matches
Mail list logo
