This is upsetting on what I hear and see not. I worked my ass off to get my relay, now i hear of a strike and tor hireing a ex-cia offical. Even though i read the resigned, that still does not make the difference does it. They have already got in and probably long enough to put in place what the
This is just plain FUD, what you're doing now.
The 3 letter agencies have known about tor, and have been complaining
that they can't break it, for a long time now. In fact (iirc), they even
supported its development at some point, because they use it themselves.
The fact that they're using it is n
Hello,
I have been running a middle relay for one year in a few days.
I would expect the relay to push more traffic than it does.
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/875F74A3DC14737BECA06F8B500022154D1A29D1
What is the reason for it not handling more traffic?
The Internet connection is 2
> Could it be that it is due to the quite slow hardware, even though I know
> that it is able to push more traffic?
Yep, surely.
You currently push 3Mbps of traffic, which is correct for this kind of hardware.
All "cheap" hardware (raspi, banana, olimex, pine…) suffer of the fact they
don’t have
as to the
> quantity of evil nodes, or the hard interest and real capabilities of
> PA's.
>
> To make the call you'd need that, and perf metrics of your net under
> different ratios of advertised:consumed:nodecount, and min/avg/max/stddev
> of idle/random/full pat
> Could it be that it is due to the quite slow hardware, even though I know
> that it is able to push more traffic?
I notice too your relay got the guard flag very recently. So your relay is
currently probably not at full capacity and rather at a low one (relay usage
drops at guard flag assignme
On Sat, 03 Sep 2016 16:53:25 +0200
Aeris wrote:
> > Could it be that it is due to the quite slow hardware, even though I know
> > that it is able to push more traffic?
>
> Yep, surely.
>
> You currently push 3Mbps of traffic, which is correct for this kind of
> hardware.
> All "cheap" hardware
Looking at Atlas your relay advertises 2.45 MB/s which is quite low for
a 100Mbit connection: 2.45 MByte x 8 = 19.6 MbitWhat value do you have
in your torrc? For a 100mbit connection it should be at least:
BandwidthRate 12 MB
-- Originalmeddelande --
Från: "Roman Mamedov"
Till: "Aeri
> According to 'openssl speed aes-128-cbc' the Allwinner A20 CPU in Banana Pro
> is capable of about 25 MBytes/sec in AES performance. While that won't
> translate 1:1 into Tor performance, as Farid noted in his case the CPU
> isn't being a bottleneck, with only 10-20% CPU load observed.
I don’t u
It seems as if Cpu1 is almost idle most of the time.
Cpu0 is somewhere between 5 and 20.
This is a rather high snapshot:
%Cpu0 : 17.2 us, 2.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 79.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 1.3 si, 0.0 st
%Cpu1 : 2.4 us, 0.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.3 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
I have had the g
bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160903/b1ce48da/attachment-0001.sig>
--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 20:14:08 +0500
From: Roman Mamedov
To: Aeris
Cc: tor-relays@l
Daniel Boone
The answers to your questions depend on what you want to do.
> Log options
If you leave them all commented, by default you'll get 'Log notice file
/var/log/tor/log'. This is probably what you want unless you're
debugging some issue.
> ControlPort 9051
I'm **pretty sure** this is j
Daniel Boone
I missed your SOCKS question.
If you do not intend to directly use this Tor instance to access the Tor
network, you should leave the SocksPort as it was. By default Tor only
listens on localhost:9050 (as the documentation indicates). Therefore,
even if you *do* intend to use this Tor
I agree to everything Matt said.
A good rule of thumb for tor configuration is "leave everything at
default, unless you've got a reason to change it".
Also keep in mind that configuration files (and especially their
comments) are mostly about what you CAN do, not what you SHOULD do.
Regarding th
First, let me welcome you to the world of relay operators! It's always
nice to see new faces here, because it means I'm not the only "new guy"
(just started running a relay not that long ago). Of course you won't be
kicked out just for that one mail! I've seen a lot of worse FUD on here,
which is p
050 #
> Default: Bind to localhost:9050 for local connections.*
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/t
16 matches
Mail list logo
