Okay, Its 6am and I need more coffee. Sorry, my bad!
Thank you very much!
Markus
2016-10-28 6:05 GMT+02:00 grarpamp :
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Markus Koch
> wrote:
>> I tried to reject the IP
>> space of funio but Tor is telling me its not allowed. Why?
>
> Your syntax is probably wr
You cant, Tor will give out a error msg:
Oct 28 07:07:32.653 [warn] Malformed mask on address range
"184.107.0.0/16*"; rejecting.
Oct 28 07:07:32.654 [warn] Couldn't parse line "184.107.0.0/16*". Dropping
Oct 28 07:07:32.654 [warn] Malformed policy 'reject 184.107.0.0/16*'.
Discarding entire polic
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Markus Koch wrote:
> I tried to reject the IP
> space of funio but Tor is telling me its not allowed. Why?
Your syntax is probably wrong. Search and read the "ExitPolicy"
section in the manpage for tor(1). You probably want...
ExitPolicy reject 184.107.0.0/16:*
I am getting them as well. I haven't blocked yet, are you suggesting we should?
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 22:58, Markus Koch wrote:
>
> Getting abuse mass mails on nearly all exist in the last hours:
>
> The following intrusion attempts were detected:
>
> ./pilipia/pilipiak.com:188.166.63.113 - -
Getting abuse mass mails on nearly all exist in the last hours:
The following intrusion attempts were detected:
./pilipia/pilipiak.com:188.166.63.113 - - [27/Oct/2016:18:06:35 -0400]
"GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 5734 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1"
./pilipia/pili
Okay, I have tornull.org running on 10 exists and got 2 abuse mails
(both bots). No clue if it helps, I will try it for half a year and
see what happens. I really cant tell if all the rejects are legit. I
only checked a few and it looked legit.
Markus
2016-10-08 2:04 GMT+02:00 Matthew Finkel :
>
On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote:
> Hi Kenneth
>
> I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of
> exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing
> these and other related issues with many lawyers.
Good to know. Keeps me and my coho
On 10/27/2016 02:18 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
>> An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
>> like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
>> Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited
No. Thats my problem too, around 90% of my abuse mails are bot related
and you cant do anything about it.
Markus
2016-10-27 20:24 GMT+02:00 pa011 :
> Hi,
>
> got the abuse below on three different exits. Anybody having any idea what to
> do and how to possibly to stop this in the future?
> Than
Hi,
got the abuse below on three different exits. Anybody having any idea what to
do and how to possibly to stop this in the future?
Thanks Paul
CERT-EU has received information regarding an infected IP belonging to your
network, which may have security problems. The information regarding the
Thanks everyone for your assistance.
I'm looking out for an ISP **and** putting all this information
into practice ASAP.
I'll be glad to share notes, whenever, again.
Lluís
Julien ROBIN:
> Hi,
>
> You can check if there is no physical problem on your line, just in case
> ! Connect to your mode
On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
> An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
> like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
> Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability
> corporations (LLCs)
Which guide is th
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Peter Palfrader
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Alan wrote:
> >> 0.2.5.12 is the latest version from the repo. Im assuming I should pull
> >> down the source and compile it.
> >
> > Depends on the repo. If you provid
13 matches
Mail list logo