Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

> On 14 Dec. 2016, at 06:01, Rana wrote: > > After 9 days of running a relay with a stable IP address (with “Stable” flag > during the last 4 days) and consensus bw steadily oscillating around 20 > despite the 100 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured by Tor and 200 Kbyte/s

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

-Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Niehaus Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:07 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Am 13.12.2016 um 20:01

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Am 13.12.2016 um 20:01 schrieb Rana: > Any other advice / ideas welcome. You have been asked for fingerpring or atlas link several times. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list

[tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

After 9 days of running a relay with a stable IP address (with "Stable" flag during the last 4 days) and consensus bw steadily oscillating around 20 despite the 100 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured by Tor and 200 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured on the Internet connection, I guess it is time to quit. My relay

Re: [tor-relays] Does the "Advertised bandwidth" correlates with the "Consensus Weight"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/12/2016 10:05 PM, teor wrote: > h, which is one of the factors that feeds into the measured > bandwidth. > > Part of the calculation process for the consensus weight makes > sure that this feedback converges, rather than diverging. Ah thx,