I am interested in this as well. I am thinking of installing a new bridge
on Digital Ocean in Singapore. Considering geographical location is there a
preferred pluggable transport?
P.S. I'm new to the list. Computer hobbyist. I've used Linux for 15+ years
almost exclusively but I'm no where near a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Why don't you use the Accounting setting?
AccountingMax and AccountingStart in the settings.
I think the only downside with it is that Tor does not advertise the
directory port.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYbVuPAAoJEK6hLaeDn2v6XG0P
I had a limit on one exit of 1000 gb per month - Ive set the speed as 5mbps
which works for that limit (only measured on tx) so divide by 10 and youre
looking at 0.5mbps on your torrc file setting - you can also set accountingmax
so you dontgo over this.
Also if its a new relay then the bandwi
This has been discussed before, try searching the archives with something like
"AccountingMax vs RelayBandwidthRate".
I think teor gave a very good answer here:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-May/006956.html
The technique you'll want to use really depends on whether you
RelayBandwidthRate 400 KBytes
BandwidthRate 400 KBytes
there are running other services too.
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 21:18 schrieb ike:
I apreciate I'm not going to keep a relay running 24 hours on this server but
I'd like to know if there
I apreciate I'm not going to keep a relay running 24 hours on this server but
I'd like to know if there was a guide
for balancing uptime vs bandwidth or if this is even something tor itself would
handle.
If tor used all the available bandwidth I'd hit my target in just 100 seconds
uptime ever
there is no speed limit? I am the opinion that I have read something
about 250 kb / s!
Random Mirror / Tor Node Operator
Am 04.01.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Toralf Förster:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
say less than 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/04/2017 07:54 PM, ike wrote:
> say less than 100GB each way per month?
$> echo "scale=2.0; 100 * 1024^3 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024" | bc
39.14
So you're asking, if 40 KB/sec would be the better choice ?
- --
Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E
--
Hey!
Here a "vnstat" example on a relay, I hope it will help you.
Only Tor is set up, nothing else. This relay has guard flag.
Cheers.
Le 04/01/2017 à 19:54, ike a écrit :
Hi folks,
Is there a generally accepted recommendation for
Hi folks,
Is there a generally accepted recommendation for how to set up a relay on a
server with a fast connection but
limited monthly transfers, say less than 100GB each way per month?
Having done a bit of reading it seems daily limits are the way to go but I've
found contradictory informati
Its a limit that many vps suppliers set > 3 gets you a warning - I'll set
the limit to 29k tonight - its only an issue on shared resources like vps
Cheers
Mark B
Snaptor.co.uk (non commercial)
> On 4 Jan 2017, at 13:16, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Sec INT w
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Sec INT wrote:
>
> Just had an issue on a 60mbps exit where conntrack sessions went over the
> usual 3 limit - is this possible for a normal operating exit relay? Is
> there any default limit set on this or indeed is there a setting intorrc to
> control the n
Hi
Just had an issue on a 60mbps exit where conntrack sessions went over the usual
3 limit - is this possible for a normal operating exit relay? Is there any
default limit set on this or indeed is there a setting intorrc to control the
number of sessions?
Cheers
Mark B
Snaptor.co.uk (non c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
I'm in the midst of relaunching Tor Cloud. I renamed it Onion
Cloud as per a Tor Cloud suggestion.
It's built upon Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS (Xenial Xerus). I might add support
for Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS (Trusty Tahr) but in the meantime I'm
concentrat
14 matches
Mail list logo
