Re: [tor-relays] Call for Tor Fallback Directories

2017-01-07 Thread l3thal
please add my relays as fallback mirrors, thanks On Dec 4, 2016 5:45 AM, "teor" wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Tor Relay Operator, Your relay(s) can help tor clients find the tor network by becoming a fallback directory mirror.[0] These mirrors are hard-coded into

[tor-relays] c23088def3e324089ed7bbe4b00082b251c06026

2017-01-07 Thread mario
___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/2017 08:00 PM, Efthimis Iosifdis wrote: > > You may also have a look at this article if it helps and in case this is > a new Tor Relay node: > > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay /me wonders if this link should be

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Efthimis Iosifdis
Hello Thomas. You may also have a look at this article if it helps and in case this is a new Tor Relay node: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay Cheers, Dr Ciphers On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 17:55:12 +0200 Thomas Maurice wrote Hello

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:55:12 +0100 Thomas Maurice wrote: > It is supposed to be caped at 20MBps, and 25MBps burst so I doubt the > limitation I am observing is enforced by the node itself. You mean traffic limitation in torrc? Remove it. There is no reason to apply bandwidth caps unless you want

[tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Thomas Maurice
Hello all ! o/ It seems I am running into a performance issue with my relay, and I am not able to troubleshoot it, so I hope someone could point out something obvious I am missing! (for information, the relay is a 2vCPU, 2G RAM VM running on Scaleway) From what I observe from the graphs, my maxi