Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

Im running an EXIT-relay on a hosted system for three month now. At home i started with a raspberry about 3-4 years ago. I successfully fought 2 abuse complaints and had no problems with my normal internet usage at home. 4-5 month ago it started with more and more issues during normal internet

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

Hi, > I challenge you to keep it as an exit, exits are more helpful and more > fun to run. Just fight with abuse complaints, it's not that hard and > it'll make you feel better :) try keeping it as an exit. I'd suggest to run an exit relay at some datacenter and not at home. It is not advised

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

My problems are not the abuse complaints. I had two, some years ago and got some great help from the community! :) My problems are way too much capcha-challenges during my normal internet usage. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] Im

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

Volker Mink wrote: > Thanks so far. > Does it keep my stats in Atlas when i change it from an exit to a bridge? > What do i have to change in the torrc-file? > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0 > Note that if the IP address was an exit relay or

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

Thanks so far. Does it keep my stats in Atlas when i change it from an exit to a bridge? What do i have to change in the torrc-file? https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E20FF09A9A800B16C1C7C16E8C0DF95F46F649B0 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

On 14.03.2017 15:36, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote: > My concern with this is the liability on operator. In Finland (and > Europe?) Yes, this is "harmonized" and modelled after the US DMCA law, in Europe in the "e-Commerce directive" respectively the federal implementations. See

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

On 03/14/2017 12:03 PM, Matt Traudt wrote: > > > On 3/14/17 13:32, Volker Mink wrote: >> Hey Folks. >> >> >> >> I am going to change my Exit to a Bridge or whatever. >> >> When im browsing the Web i receive tons auf capchas and my KODI >> mediacenter >> is unable to update itself. >> >> I have

Re: [tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

On 3/14/17 13:32, Volker Mink wrote: Hey Folks. I am going to change my Exit to a Bridge or whatever. When im browsing the Web i receive tons auf capchas and my KODI mediacenter is unable to update itself. I have my private IP fromm y Internet connection listet on some blacklists. Thats

[tor-relays] Changing exit to bridge

Hey Folks. I am going to change my Exit to a Bridge or whatever. When im browsing the Web i receive tons auf capchas and my KODI mediacenter is unable to update itself. I have my private IP fromm y Internet connection listet on some blacklists. Thats bad. What can i do to contribute and

Re: [tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

Hi Florentin, Read the policy of your hoster. I had the same situation and already configured a reduced exit policy. So I just changed my exit policy. Now I do not relay to their entire IP block on port 80 anymore. So it can't happen again.. My hoster was fine with that. Along with this I

Re: [tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

If its an exit just use the reduced reduced exit policy - I dont get any abuse complaints apart from those heroes at webiron Cheers Mark B Snaptor.co.uk (non commercial) > On 14 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:17:14PM +0100,

Re: [tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:17:14PM +0100, Moritz Bartl wrote: > about it" might not be the best argument here either: I suggest you > block the destination IP address(es) for some weeks via ExitPolicy, let My concern with this is the liability on operator. In Finland (and Europe?), the limited

[tor-relays] Aggressive abuse report

Hi list, I am running Kadoc[0] for a few weeks and got today a more aggressive complain from a System Administrator of my VPS provider. I seek for an appropriate response to not get banned. Does someone experienced a similar scenario and succeeded to educate the sys admins ? Here's the

Re: [tor-relays] [FYI] cymrubridge02 maintenance - quick reboot

Thank you for running this bridge!! > On Mar 13, 2017, at 15:50, Sina Rabbani wrote: > > Dear Team, > > cymrubridge02 (meek-azure) needs a reboot, it's going to be down for > less than a min and will come right back up. >>