Wouldn‘t something like KernelCare help which patches the kernel without the
need to reboot?
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Relay uptime versus outdated Tor version
> Local Time: 17 August 2017 6:11 PM
> UTC Time: 17 August 2017 16:11
> From: toralf.foers...@gmx.
In theory hot-patching kernels is a great idea.
However, they're technically not loading a new kernel. Something like
kexec in theory lets one load a new kernel.
Furthermore, these hot-patching programs usually only support Linux. If
we want to increase the diversity of the Tor network, as we
hi
i am running a relay on a raspberry pi v.1. it ran along just fine until
i updated to debian stretch. i have reviewed the config to see what
could be wrong, but i cannot find anything. this is what gets put in the
logs over and over:
Aug 18 09:52:41.000 [notice] Tor 0.2.9.11 (git-572f457
Hi,
Did you compil it yourself or do you use the version provided by Raspbian.
In the first case, re-compil it on Stretch because there myght be some
things which are not compatible on Stretch from Jessie?
Strange there is no error message, maybe in syslog?
Hop this helps,
Patrick
Le 18/08/20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I do wonder if I do still need all of these files at my exit relay with verion
0.3.1.5-alpha ?
$> ls keys/
ed25519_master_id_public_key ed25519_signing_secr
Tom Ritter wrote
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:06:55 -0500:
> The good news is that my bwauth measured you at 75600, which is a bit
> below the other two measurements, but in line with them. So once
> maatuska starts voting on this data you'll be popped back up.
maatuska is now voting on bandwidth measure
