Hi,
On 21/10/17 09:06, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> That said, the folks handling tshirt requests are the real arbiters
> of how they are interpreting my sentences, so I will defer to them. :)
I was sure we had a bug for this, but I can't find it. Here's a bug I
just filed to include eligibility
Thanks a lot for your hint.
On 21.10.2017 12:45, Alexander Dietrich wrote:
> Sounds like bug #23551
> (https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23551), which will
> apparently get a fix on 0.3.1.
Yes, it really looks like that. Seems to be zstd version
incompatibility. I discovered it
On 2017-10-21 01:25, diffusae wrote:
Oct 21 01:09:10.000 [warn] tor_bug_occurred_: Bug:
src/common/compress.c:576: tor_compress_process: Non-fatal assertion
!((rv == TOR_COMPRESS_OK) && *in_len == in_len_orig && *out_len ==
out_len_orig) failed. (on Tor 0.3.1.7 6babd3d9ba9318b3)
Oct 21
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:28:34AM +0100, Dylan Issa wrote:
> To add on this, if my Tor relay was restarted for a reason (resets downtime)
> but previously had ~50 days uptime, if I get the remaining 10 days am I
> eligible? Or must it be at least 60 days of continuous uptime?
> Because I had 50
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:27:22PM -0400, tor wrote:
> In a relay's logs:
>
> Oct 20 10:31:47 X Tor[]: We're low on memory. Killing circuits with
> over-long queues. (This behavior is controlled by MaxMemInQueues.)
> Oct 20 10:32:11 X Tor[]: Removed 1565259696 bytes by killing 1
