[tor-relays] Testing Golang relay implementation

2017-10-23 Thread Michael McLoughlin
All, I am working on a pure Golang relay implementation. https://github.com/mmcloughlin/pearl/ I have thus far been testing locally with chutney ( https://gitweb.torproject.org/chutney.git). The project is not complete by any stretch, but I believe I am close to the point where it can handle

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread Trey Nolen
On 10/23/2017 6:12 PM, teor wrote: On 24 Oct 2017, at 09:08, s7r wrote: it looks like your relay has a measured by authority 'bastet' of 355. That is not a big value. The other authorities measured this: 278; 355; 367; 803; So it looks like the speed was pretty much the

Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread nusenu
(don't take this information as granted this was a quick 'n dirty thing) David Goulet: > Since July 2017 It appears to have started earlier than July if you graph metrics' csv file for better granularity. Maybe somewhere in mid May 2017 (maybe when tor 0.2.9.x -> 0.3.0 started to spread? ->

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread teor
> On 24 Oct 2017, at 09:08, s7r wrote: > > it looks like your relay has a measured by authority 'bastet' of > 355. That is not a big value. The other authorities measured this: > > 278; > 355; > 367; > 803; > > So it looks like the speed was pretty much the same for the

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread s7r
Trey Nolen wrote: > >> First of all, thanks for running a relay. >> >> Based on my experience, what usually happens is that the provider of >> your VPS observed during a period of time you used more than N mbps >> constantly and all the time, so they capped your VPS at some KB/s limit. >> There

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread Trey Nolen
No, not yet.  I was planning on setting up Atlas but haven't had a chance.  This was a little test server we had spun up for various projects and we decided to just run a node on it.   However, we plan on keeping it going now, if we can get it running so that it actually

Re: [tor-relays] onionoo issue (was: decrease in traffic)

2017-10-23 Thread nusenu
Stephane Thevenot: > BTW is the atlas webserver running ? database backend problem ? onionoo (atlas backend) has currently some issues, the maintainer and admins are looking into it https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23929 -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread Trey Nolen
On 10/23/2017 04:36 PM, nusenu wrote: > > Trey Nolen: >> I'm new to running a Tor relay and started one about a month ago.   I've >> got 50 Mbps dedicated to it and at first it climbed in traffic pretty >> steadily until it got to around 25-30 Mbps being used.   Since then, it >> has declined

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread Stephane Thevenot
I'm not trhotling VPS when renting them :) for real !! BTW is the atlas webserver running ? database backend problem ? https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/208.94.110.37 Le 2017-10-23 17:34, s7r a écrit : > Hi, > > Trey Nolen wrote: > >> I'm new to running a Tor relay and started one

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread Trey Nolen
> First of all, thanks for running a relay. > > Based on my experience, what usually happens is that the provider of > your VPS observed during a period of time you used more than N mbps > constantly and all the time, so they capped your VPS at some KB/s limit. > There are performance monitoring

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread s7r
Hi, Trey Nolen wrote: > I'm new to running a Tor relay and started one about a month ago.   I've > got 50 Mbps dedicated to it and at first it climbed in traffic pretty > steadily until it got to around 25-30 Mbps being used.   Since then, it > has declined steadily and is down to about 350 KBps

Re: [tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread nusenu
Trey Nolen: > I'm new to running a Tor relay and started one about a month ago.   I've > got 50 Mbps dedicated to it and at first it climbed in traffic pretty > steadily until it got to around 25-30 Mbps being used.   Since then, it > has declined steadily and is down to about 350 KBps now (yes,

[tor-relays] decrease in traffic

2017-10-23 Thread Trey Nolen
I'm new to running a Tor relay and started one about a month ago.   I've got 50 Mbps dedicated to it and at first it climbed in traffic pretty steadily until it got to around 25-30 Mbps being used.   Since then, it has declined steadily and is down to about 350 KBps now (yes, I'm keeping the units

Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread David Goulet
On 23 Oct (22:49:55), rasptor 4273 wrote: > My relay has gone off the consensus. > Fingerprint: E7FFF8C3D5736AB87215C5DB05620103033E69C3 Interesting. And it is still running as of now without any problems? Can you give me the IP/ORPORT tuple? You think you can add this to your torrc and then HUP

Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread rasptor 4273
My relay has gone off the consensus. Fingerprint: E7FFF8C3D5736AB87215C5DB05620103033E69C3 Alias: rasptor4273 Am running Tor 0.2.5.14 on Debian, Raspberry Pi 2B. I upgraded to that version on September 3rd. I grepped through these:

Re: [tor-relays] tor network change and event detection

2017-10-23 Thread nusenu
> Was it picked up by any alerts earlier, especially those two big and > short-term drops? I assume you mean the bridges line, they didn't remain unnoticed [1] and you can find their explanation here: https://metrics.torproject.org/news.html [1]

Re: [tor-relays] tor network change and event detection

2017-10-23 Thread George
nusenu: >> As some of you know, TDP did a little suite of shell scripts based on >> OONI data to look at diversity statistics: > > I think you mean onionoo (not OONI). Yes. Sloppy on details when thinking conceptually sometimes :) > >> In other words, daily reports would be run on, say, bw

Re: [tor-relays] tor network change and event detection

2017-10-23 Thread nusenu
> As some of you know, TDP did a little suite of shell scripts based on > OONI data to look at diversity statistics: I think you mean onionoo (not OONI). > In other words, daily reports would be run on, say, bw consensus by > country, and if there was some statistically significant change over N

Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread George
David Goulet: > Hello everyone! > > Since July 2017, there has been a steady decline in relays from ~7k to now > ~6.5k. This is a bit unusual that is we don't see often such a steady behavior > of relays going offline (at least that I can remember...). > > It could certainly be something normal

Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread David Goulet
On 23 Oct (09:37:31), Eli wrote: > I can state the reason I stopped hosting my exit relay was due to tor rpm > package not being up to date for CentOS 7. The last available version was > considered out of date and no longer supported. So instead of running a > relay that was potentially

Re: [tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread Eli
I can state the reason I stopped hosting my exit relay was due to tor rpm package not being up to date for CentOS 7. The last available version was considered out of date and no longer supported. So instead of running a relay that was potentially detrimental to the health of the tor network I

[tor-relays] Decline in relays

2017-10-23 Thread David Goulet
Hello everyone! Since July 2017, there has been a steady decline in relays from ~7k to now ~6.5k. This is a bit unusual that is we don't see often such a steady behavior of relays going offline (at least that I can remember...). It could certainly be something normal here. However, we shouldn't