Re: [tor-relays] Is your IPv6 relay not Running?

2017-12-12 Thread tor
+1, thanks for working on IPv6! Just curious and didn't see an answer on the roadmap -- do bandwidth authority measurements ever happen over IPv6? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Is your IPv6 relay not Running?

2017-12-12 Thread Johan Fleury
Thanks for all the work you did and keep doing! IPv6 is really important to me so I'm really pleased to see that you can move toward its full support in Tor :) -- Johan Fleury PGP Key ID : 0x5D404386805E56E6 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [tor-relays] Is your IPv6 relay not Running?

2017-12-12 Thread teor
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 15:31, Johan Fleury wrote: > > Is there anywhere we could follow the IPv6 support progress? Here's a quick summary: We are focused on authorities and relays in 0.3.3. Later, we will work on clients and onion services. We chose this order because some

Re: [tor-relays] Is your IPv6 relay not Running?

2017-12-12 Thread Johan Fleury
Is there anywhere we could follow the IPv6 support progress? -- Johan Fleury PGP Key ID : 0x5D404386805E56E6 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread Sina Rabbani
Dear Tor Relay Operators, Faravahar had some hardware issues last night, while I was on an airplane without internet access. It took me a few hours to respond and I apologize for the delay. Please note that redundancy is built into the network, and I am committed to operating this system with

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread teor
On 13 Dec 2017, at 08:17, tor wrote: >> this time though I ran Wireshark while started tor, and it appears tor is >> transmitting encrypted info over port 80. > >> Surely tor shouldn't be transmitting unencrypted messages? > > I'm not an expert on the protocol but you may

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread Igor Mitrofanov
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:17 PM, tor wrote: >>I am getting this too, I saw this the logs a few months ago and didn't think >>anything of it. > > > I wouldn't worry about it. Faravahar has a long history of misbehavior: > >

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread tor
>I am getting this too, I saw this the logs a few months ago and didn't think >anything of it. I wouldn't worry about it. Faravahar has a long history of misbehavior: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-November/008097.html

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/12/2017 11:54 AM, teor wrote: > I assume the operator is aware and is working on a fix. There're since months errors logged here for that machine. I decided to ignore all errors from that machine. - -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread Gary Smith
Hello. I am getting this too, I saw this the logs a few months ago and didn't think anything of it, this time though I ran Wireshark while started tor, and it appears tor is transmitting encrypted info over port 80. I have the .pcap file to prove it. I started / stopped the relay a few times so

Re: [tor-relays] DoS attacks are real (probably)

2017-12-12 Thread r1610091651
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 at 18:07 Felix wrote: > Hi Alex > > Great points. > > > conntrack -L -p tcp --dport 9001 | awk '{print $5}' | sort | uniq -c > | sort -n > > On FreeBSD one can do: > > In packetfilter: > > # play with the numbers but more than 64k per ip if

Re: [tor-relays] Action relays on 188.214.30.0/24 subnet

2017-12-12 Thread x9p
On Fri, December 8, 2017 7:22 am, x9p wrote: > ... > > Thanks again. Am already on the boat. > > cheers. > > x9p The set of "potentially" (no proof!) unwanted relays was updated (looks automagically via script or sort of), still do not have their HSDir flag back, only 17h uptime. Meanwhile, HS

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread teor
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 20:36, r1610091651 wrote: > > Hi > > I'm seeing regular issues with faravahar in logs lately. Is somebody working > on this? faravahar is not voting, so it's probably down: https://consensus-health.torproject.org/ I assume the operator is aware

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread Paul Templeton
Yup - Me Too... - Original Message - From: "Aneesh Dogra" To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 8:47:30 PM Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar? On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, r1610091651 < r1610091...@telenet.be

Re: [tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread Aneesh Dogra
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, r1610091651 wrote: > Hi > > I'm seeing regular issues with faravahar in logs lately. Is somebody > working on this? > > Logs: > Dec 12 10:32:56.000 [warn] HTTP status 502 ("Bad Gateway") was unexpected > while uploading descriptor to

[tor-relays] Issues with faravahar?

2017-12-12 Thread r1610091651
Hi I'm seeing regular issues with faravahar in logs lately. Is somebody working on this? Logs: Dec 12 10:32:56.000 [warn] HTTP status 502 ("Bad Gateway") was unexpected while uploading descriptor to server '154.35.175.225:80'. Possibly the server is misconfigured? Dec 12 10:33:56.000 [warn]