Re: [tor-relays] failed setup of obfs4 on relay

Thank you all, that was very helpful. - Jack 30. Mar 2018 20:53 by a...@mit.edu : > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 04:52:23PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: >> For obfs4, the active prober doesn't know the secret "cert" parameter, > > For far far more detail on the various

Re: [tor-relays] Estimation of bridge traffic / Bridge or relay needed?

> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#RelayOrBridge In context of the entire wider section beyond the former quote, where 'normal' is implied to be 'non-exit', I'd change one entry... > a normal relay, since we need more exits. to 'an exit relay, since...'

Re: [tor-relays] Estimation of bridge traffic / Bridge or relay needed?

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 03:32:00AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#RelayOrBridge > > > > "If you have lots of bandwidth, you should definitely run a normal relay. > > If you're willing to be an exit, you should definitely run a normal > > relay, since we need more

Re: [tor-relays] Estimation of bridge traffic / Bridge or relay needed?

> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#RelayOrBridge > > "If you have lots of bandwidth, you should definitely run a normal relay. > If you're willing to be an exit, you should definitely run a normal > relay, since we need more exits. If you can't be an exit and only have a > little bit of